2021
DOI: 10.20885/psikologika.vol26.iss2.art4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Assessment of Organizational Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats of Zakat Distribution Organizations in Malaysia

Abstract: There have been emerging issues toward the increasing amount of zakat collection and the slower pace of zakat distribution (Lubis et al., 2011). These issues create dissatisfaction which increases negative perception towards Zakat Distribution Organizations (ZDOs) amongst the zakat payers (Yusof, 2010). The objective of this study is to assess the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of ZDOs. The methods used in this study were document analysis and Focus Group Discussion (FGD) conducted among the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data collected were first classified into strengths and weaknesses which represent internal factors and into opportunities and threats which represent external factors [12]. Afterwards, the internal factors were analyzed by using Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) Matrix and the external factors were analyzed by using External Factor Evaluation (EFE) Matrix to gain insight on internal and external business environment [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data collected were first classified into strengths and weaknesses which represent internal factors and into opportunities and threats which represent external factors [12]. Afterwards, the internal factors were analyzed by using Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) Matrix and the external factors were analyzed by using External Factor Evaluation (EFE) Matrix to gain insight on internal and external business environment [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%