The Assessment of Selectivity in Different Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry Acquisition Modes

Abstract

Abstract. Selectivity of the confirmation of identity in liquid chromatography (tandem) mass spectrometry using Q-Orbitrap instrumentation was assessed using different acquisition modes based on a representative experimental data set constructed from 108 samples, including six different matrix extracts and containing over 100 analytes each. Single stage full scan, all ion fragmentation, and product ion scanning were applied. By generating reconstructed ion chromatograms using unit mass window in targeted MS 2 , selected reaction monitoring (SRM), regularly applied using triplequadrupole instruments, was mimicked. This facilitated the comparison of single stage full scan, all ion fragmentation, (mimicked) SRM, and product ion scanning applying a mass window down to 1 ppm. Single factor Analysis of Variance was carried out on the variance (s 2 ) of the mass error to determine which factors and interactions are significant parameters with respect to selectivity. We conclude that selectivity is related to the target compound (mainly the mass defect), the matrix, sample clean-up, concentration, and mass resolution. Selectivity of the different instrumental configurations was quantified by counting the number of interfering peaks observed in the chromatograms. We conclude that precursor ion selection significantly contributes to selectivity: monitoring of a single product ion at high mass accuracy with a 1 Da precursor ion window proved to be equally selective or better to monitoring two transition products in mimicked SRM. In contrast, monitoring a single fragment in all ion fragmentation mode results in significantly lower selectivity versus mimicked SRM. After a thorough interlaboratory evaluation study, the results of this study can be used for a critical reassessment of the current identification points system and contribute to the next generation of evidence-based and robust performance criteria in residue analysis and sports doping.

Non‐targeted acquisition strategy for screening doping compounds based on GC‐EI‐hybrid quadrupole‐Orbitrap mass spectrometry: A focus on exogenous anabolic steroids

“…Despite sample clean up and the high resolving power of the Orbitrap in full‐scan mode, we still noticed interference issues for a few compounds, mainly for anabolic steroids, due to the presence of structurally similar endogenous compounds in urine. This drawback has already been observed for analyses in which many similar compounds are present in the matrix . In those cases (e.g.…”

“…This drawback has already been observed for analyses in which many similar compounds are present in the matrix. 18,19 In those cases (e.g. Epimetendiol/EMD, Stenbolone, 4OH-testosterone, Calusterone metabolite and 5α/β-THMT) potential matrix interference was seen when several negative urine samples were analyzed even when using ±5 ppm mass extraction window.…”

A tutorial in small molecule identification via electrospray ionization‐mass spectrometry: The practical art of structural elucidation

“…This data‐independent acquisition (DIA) mode provides full MS (unfragmented) data as well as fragments of all ions in one analysis. When this collision‐energy switching is performed over a wide m / z range in one scan event, it is called MS e , MS all , or All Ion Fragmentation (AIF) . When this collision‐energy switching is performed in multiple, smaller, m / z windows to increase selectivity, this is termed “Sequential Windowed Acquisition of All Theoretical Fragment Ion Mass Spectra” (SWATH) …”

Mass spectrometric strategies for the investigation of biomarkers of illicit drug use in wastewater

“…As a function of the instrument and/or manufacturer, this operation mode for the QTOF analyzer is known as MS E (Castro‐Perez et al, ; Plumb et al, ; Díaz et al, ; Hernández et al, ) in the case of Waters, broadband collision‐induced dissociation (bbCID) (Dasenaki et al, ) in the case of Bruker, or all‐ions MS/MS (Kinyua et al, ) in the case of Agilent. Likewise for Q‐Orbitrap instruments from Thermo, this type of acquisition is also possible, and known as All Ion Fragmentation (AIF) (Coscollà et al, ; Berendsen et al, ), or variable Data‐Independent Analysis (vDIA) (Zomer & Mol, ). These approaches are possible thanks to the availability of collision gas inside the collision cell of the hybrid instruments.…”