2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2009.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The assessment of the cervical spine. Part 1: Range of motion and proprioception

Abstract: Neck pain and headache of cervical origin are complaints affecting an increasing number of the general population. Mechanical factors such as sustained neck postures or movements and long-term "abnormal" physiologic loads on the neck are believed to affect the cervical structures and compromise neck function. A comprehensive assessment of neck function requires evaluation of its physical parameters such as range of motion, proprioception, strength and endurance/fatigue. The complicated structure of the cervica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
1
45
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To minimize the effect of fatigue and pain on HRA in individuals with CDD (Pinsault and Vuillerme, 2010;Strimpakos, 2011), and because many patients with CDD have limited cervical range of motion (Peolsson et al, 2002), the range of motion during active cervical rotation was standardized to 30° (Uremovic et al, 2007) in this study. In addition, the number of trials was limited to three in both rotation directions (Loudon et al, 1997;Treleaven et al, 2003;Treleaven et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To minimize the effect of fatigue and pain on HRA in individuals with CDD (Pinsault and Vuillerme, 2010;Strimpakos, 2011), and because many patients with CDD have limited cervical range of motion (Peolsson et al, 2002), the range of motion during active cervical rotation was standardized to 30° (Uremovic et al, 2007) in this study. In addition, the number of trials was limited to three in both rotation directions (Loudon et al, 1997;Treleaven et al, 2003;Treleaven et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger than typical errors in head repositioning accuracy (HRA) have been reported in individuals with neck disorders (Revel et al, 1991;Loudon et al, 1997;Kristjansson et al, 2003;Treleaven et al, 2003); although the results are controversial (Rix and Bagust, 2001;Hill et al, 2009); without a consensus on the best method (Strimpakos, 2011). The original test used a laser to assess HRA (Revel et al, 1991), a method that has since been widely used (Heikkila and Wenngren, 1998;Vuillerme et al, 2008;Pinsault and Vuillerme, 2010) and that exhibits good reliability (Pinsault et al, 2008a) and validity (Pinsault et al, 2008b;Roren et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary measure to clinically operationalize cervical proprioception is the Joint Position Sense Error (JPSE) (Armstrong et al, 2008;Strimpakos, 2011). Joint position sense, an individual's ability to reproduce and perceive previous predetermined positions or ranges of motion of a joint, is a major component of proprioception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boyun, yüksek oranda mekanoreseptör içermesi nedeniyle propriyosepsiyon duyusu açısından oldukça önemli bir bölgedir (28,29). Servikal bölge problemlerinde tespit edilen propriyosepsiyon bozukluğundan dolayı rehabilitasyon programlarına propriyoseptif egzersizler de ilave edilmeye başlanmıştır.…”
Section: Propriyoseptif Egzersizlerunclassified