Eighth International Conference on Road Traffic Monitoring and Control 1996
DOI: 10.1049/cp:19960292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The assessment of the SCOOT system in Nijmegen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary requirement was that the signal cycle time did not grow too large, since this may have had adverse effects on cyclists' safety and journey times. A companion paper by Middelham et al gives a report on the assessment of the SCOOT system's performance relative to the existing well-maintained and updated fixed-time system known as STAR (26). For both private and public motorized traffic, SCOOT gave an increased throughput of traffic, but journey time differences were inconclusive.…”
Section: Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary requirement was that the signal cycle time did not grow too large, since this may have had adverse effects on cyclists' safety and journey times. A companion paper by Middelham et al gives a report on the assessment of the SCOOT system's performance relative to the existing well-maintained and updated fixed-time system known as STAR (26). For both private and public motorized traffic, SCOOT gave an increased throughput of traffic, but journey time differences were inconclusive.…”
Section: Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two papers for previous IEE Road Traffic Monitoring and Control Conferences, the implementation and first assessment of the SCOOT system in Nijmegen have been discussed by Middelham et al (1) and again Middelham et al (2). The implementation of the system was successful, bringing 40 intersections under SCOOT control, but took more time than expected due to the validation (tuning) process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both tasks (initial fine-tuning and calibration) are performed (if at all) by experienced personnel in the lack of an automated and systematic approach; thus there is no guarantee that the overall fine-tuning and/or maintenance procedure will end-up successfully. In some cases, the LSTCS has never achieved a satisfactory performance in the first place, as for instance in the reported case of the urban signal man-agement strategy SCOOT (the most popular urban signal management strategy worldwide) in the city of Nijmegen in The Netherlands [5], where the SCOOT application was abandoned completely in the end.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%