The Assessment of Written Phrasal Constructs and Grammar of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students with Varying Expressive Language Abilities

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the written phrasal constructs and grammar usage of deaf and hard of hearing students with varying expressive language skills. Twenty-nine d/hh middle school students attending a residential school for the deaf were divided into three language groups: students using spoken English, ASL/English bilinguals, and language delayed learners. Personal narrative writing samples were collected at the beginning, middle, and end of the academic year. The samples were divided into T-units and coded for language variables, including word efficiency ratio (WER) scores according to the Structural Analysis of Written Language (SAWL) and phrasal errors. The repeated measures ANOVA for WER III showed a statistically significant main effect with no between-subjects factor, demonstrating that students from all three language groups made positive gains in their written outcomes over one academic year. There was a reduction in phrasal errors over the course of the year for all language groups. Differences in word efficiency ratio scores by language groups are discussed. Findings from this study suggest that SAWL is an effective tool in assessing the grammaticality of written compositions for d/hh students with varying language abilities over time. Instructional implications are discussed.

English Language Proficiency Profile: A Case Study of the Communication Skills of Deaf Students in the Undergraduate Program in Quezon, Philippines

“…Student's literacy development may be an equally difficult process especially for students with intricate linguistic histories. On the other hand, D/HH students exhibit strong proficiencies in literacy areas at par with hearing peers, particularly in written expression discourse and phonological cognizance (Bowers et. al/, 2018).…”

Deaf Children as ‘English Learners’: The Psycholinguistic Turn in Deaf Education

“…SIWI also incorporates "the language zone," an interactive, meaning-focused space where deaf students who struggle to communicate their ideas in language can use multimodal resources-including gestures, role play, images, and videos-to make themselves understood [166]. Research has shown that SIWI helps students to do all of the following: write longer pieces with more complex syntax; improve their writing skills across multiple genres; transfer writing strategies across genres; develop positive writer identities; gain writing independence; improve their editing and revising skills; and develop their ASL skills [167][168][169][170][171][172][173][174][175].…”

Building strong foundations for educational achievement: Language assessments in early childhood education for deaf and hard of hearing children

“…There are many different criteria that impact developmental language. Children who are DHH may experience language delays or language deprivation, which can influence how they are able to participate in assessments (Bowers, Dostal, Wolbers, & Graham, ; Marshall & Morgan, ; Meinzen‐Derr, Wiley, Phillips, Altaye, & Choo, ). Children who are DHH may be viewed as cognitively behind their peers due to this language delay (Miller, Thomas‐Presswood, Metz, & Lukomski, ).…”