The Association between Antidepressant Use During Pregnancy and Miscarriage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Smith, Sophie; Martin, Florence; Rai, Dheerai; Forbes, Harriet

doi:10.2139/ssrn.4046664

Cited by 1 publication

(4 citation statements)

References 61 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This systematic review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, registration number CRD42021262839) 10 and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 updated guidelines 11 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We used MeSH terms for antidepressants, spontaneous abortion, and stillbirth and used subject heading and text word searches (see Supporting Information: Appendix S1). Miscarriage was included in the search terms for study selection as it is often reported together with stillbirth, but was investigated in a separate review 12 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Eligible studies must have investigated stillbirth. Details of the exclusion criteria were described in the protocol 10 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Miscarriage was included in the search terms for study selection as it is often reported together with stillbirth, but was investigated in a separate review. 12…”

Section: Literature Search Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Antidepressant use during pregnancy and risk of stillbirth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Martin

Smith

Rai

et al. 2023

Repro Female Child Health

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionTo evaluate the current evidence estimating the association between antidepressant use during pregnancy and stillbirth.Search StrategyMEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsychINFO for studies investigating antidepressant use during pregnancy and risk of stillbirth, from inception until 21 January 2022.Selection CriteriaStudies including pregnant women exposed to antidepressants during pregnancy investigating stillbirth were eligible, compared with either unexposed, indicated pregnant women or unexposed women in the general obstetric population.Data Collection and AnalysisData extraction and quality assessment were performed by two authors independently. Meta‐analysis was used to generate pooled‐effect estimates, and the ROBINS‐I tool was used to assess risk of bias for individual studies.Main ResultsSeventeen studies were eligible. Although estimates from meta‐analysis models suggest a small increased risk of stillbirth, summary effect estimate 1.19 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06, 1.34) between those individuals taking antidepressants during pregnancy and all other pregnant women, confounding control is likely inadequate. The risk of bias assessment showed most studies were low quality, with no studies scoring low risk; in a meta‐analysis of studies with moderate risk of bias (n = 2), no association was noted, summary effect estimate 1.17 (95% CI 0.97, 1.41). Only six studies adjusted for confounding by indication, the findings of which were summarised narratively.ConclusionsAlthough the overall meta‐analysis found a small association between antidepressant use during pregnancy and stillbirth, this result was likely due to the overall low quality of studies included and by confounding in the underlying studies. Future studies must adequately address potential confounding by indication.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Eligible studies must have investigated stillbirth. Details of the exclusion criteria were described in the protocol 10 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Miscarriage was included in the search terms for study selection as it is often reported together with stillbirth, but was investigated in a separate review. 12…”

Section: Literature Search Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations