The association between exposure and psychological health in earthquake survivors from the Longmen Shan Fault area: the mediating effect of risk perception

Abstract

BackgroundIn this study, exposure refers to survivors who suffered from life-changing situations, such as personal injuries, the deaths or injury of family members, relatives or friends or the loss of or damage to personal or family property, as a result of the earthquake. The mediating effect of risk perception on the exposure and psychological health in survivors from the Longmen Shan Fault area and the moderating effect of social support on the relationship between risk perception and psychological health were both examined.MethodA cross-sectional survey was conducted in a local Longmen Shan Fault area near the epicenter of the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), the standard Chinese 12-item Short Form (SF-12v2), and the Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS) were used to interview 2,080 earthquake survivors in the period one-year after the earthquake. Based on the environment and the characteristics of the Longmen Shan Fault area, a risk perception questionnaire was developed to evaluate survivor risk perception. Factor and regression analyses were conducted to determine the hypothetical relations.ResultsThe analyses provided effective support for the hypothesized model. Survivor risk perception was classified into direct risk perception and indirect risk perception. Survivor direct risk perception was found to play a partial mediating role in the relationship between exposure and the two domains (Physical component summary (PCS) and the Mental component summary (MCS)) of psychological health. Survivor indirect risk perception was found to have a only partial mediating effect on the association between exposure and MCS. Social support was found to moderate the influence of risk perception on psychological health.ConclusionRisk communication should be considered in future post-earthquake psychological assistance programs and social support strategies could also be useful in improving psychological health.

Relationship Between Risk Perception, Social Support, and Mental Health Among General Chinese Population During the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…For example, the government could establish an emergency risk communication management system to help people to avoid or mitigate the negative impact of COVID-19 on their mental health by controlling risk perception levels, especially perceived controllability of risk. 48 As to building reasonable risk perception, it is important to provide the public with authentic and accurate information and control the contagious disease outbreaks as soon as possible. 49 , 50 On the other hand, social support should be paid more attention to when conducting psychological interventions.…”

Health Risks in Disaster Responders: A Conceptual Framework

“…Minor depression and anxiety can account for short-term mental health problems that are likely to develop into chronic forms, such as PTSD, in later stages. 4,[16][17][18] Medical personnel 19 and professional disaster workers 20 in particular were reported as being more exposed to emotionally traumatic events during disaster response, such as injuries, losses incurred by disaster victims, violence, deaths, separation, and grief. Relating to this, PTSD emerged amongst the literature as a common long-term outcome of trauma exposure.…”

Post-traumatic stress disorder and psychological distress in Chinese youths following the COVID-19 emergency

“…Furthermore, previous studies have shown that participants with higher level of psychological distress, such as anxiety, depression, and fear, are more likely to develop PTSD symptoms (Wang et al, 2020b; Xi et al, 2020). This may be because people fear injury and death, especially under unexpected and unprepared situations, which can create panic, fear, and tension (Xu et al, 2016). Since the events are unexpected, people will feel confused about their current situation, and they will be uncertain about their future (Yates and Stone, 1992).…”