2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The association between fetching for milking and dairy cows' behaviour at milking, and avoidance of human approach — An on-farm study in herds with automatic milking systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies evaluated cattle’s fear responses to humans from several aspects using different experimental designs [ 42 , 43 ]. According to a recent work, reactivity to humans is mainly influenced by the previous experience of an animal towards humans, and in cattle it can be influenced by fear [ 44 ] resulting in higher avoidance [ 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies evaluated cattle’s fear responses to humans from several aspects using different experimental designs [ 42 , 43 ]. According to a recent work, reactivity to humans is mainly influenced by the previous experience of an animal towards humans, and in cattle it can be influenced by fear [ 44 ] resulting in higher avoidance [ 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most producers set the AMS so that milking can be performed only after a minimum interval of 3 h (Bruckmaier et al, 2001) and set a secondary warning if the cow exceeds a maximum milking interval of (usually) more than 14 h. The secondary warning indicates that the cow needs to be brought to the AMS. Producers report that the effort required to fetch a cow involves identifying them in the milking interval data and then finding and bringing them to the holding area in front of the AMS (Rousing et al, 2005). Rodenburg (2008) reported that 15% of the cows included in their study needed to be fetched by the producers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequency of milking and month (pre/post-AMS) of the study were highly correlated, making it difficult to determine whether the almost 13% yield increase was due to the change in milking system or the increase in milking visits. Milking frequencies of 1.4 to 3.2 times per day have been reported, with the study farm more closely matching the higher end [47][48][49]. Early lactation animals and those with a lower parity have been shown to visit the AMS the most [21,50].…”
Section: Milk Production Parametersmentioning
confidence: 67%