2014
DOI: 10.17795/ajcmi-22165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Association Between Chlamydia pneumoniae Infection and Ischemic Stroke

Abstract: Background: Chlamydia pneumoniae has been linked with increased risk of cardiovascular diseases; however, data on stroke and cerebrovascular accidents are sparse. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the association between C. pneumoniae infection and ischemic stroke. Patients and Methods:In a case-control study, 141 patients, admitted with ischemic stroke, were compared with gender and age-matched control subjects (n = 141). Using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit, the presence of C. pneu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quality assessment of included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS). Required information included first author, publication year, location of each studies, type of infection agents, diagnostic methods of infection, age, gender, case group, control group, and number of infected cases in both case and control groups ( Table 1 ) [ [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] , [44] , [45] , [46] , [47] , [48] , [49] , [50] , [51] , [52] , [53] , [54] , [55] , [56] , [57] , [58] , [59] , [60] , [61] , [62] , [63] , [64] ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality assessment of included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS). Required information included first author, publication year, location of each studies, type of infection agents, diagnostic methods of infection, age, gender, case group, control group, and number of infected cases in both case and control groups ( Table 1 ) [ [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] , [44] , [45] , [46] , [47] , [48] , [49] , [50] , [51] , [52] , [53] , [54] , [55] , [56] , [57] , [58] , [59] , [60] , [61] , [62] , [63] , [64] ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%