The association between junior tennis players’ physical and cognitive attributes and groundstroke performance

Abstract

Improving groundstroke velocity and accuracy is critical for tennis success. However, there is limited research available on the physical and cognitive attributes required for groundstroke performance. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the physical and cognitive characteristics and their association with groundstroke performance in junior tennis players. Thirty-four competitive junior tennis players, aged 12.59 ± 2.44 years, participated in this cross-sectional study. Cognitive tests assessing processing speed, complex attention, cognitive flexibility and problem-solving capacity and physical tests assessing flexibility, speed, agility, power, strength and anaerobic and aerobic capacity were performed. Tennis groundstroke performance was evaluated using a novel tennis groundstroke assessment. Tennis groundstroke performance was associated ( p < 0.05) with the number of hours a participant practices per week, their ranking, lower and upper body power, tennis agility test (decision and total time), linear speed, upper body strength and aerobic capacity. Specifically, an estimated 83.76% of the groundstroke velocity accuracy index variability was explained by grip strength in the dominant hand and ranking. An estimated 79.63% of the groundstroke velocity accuracy error index variability was explained by the number of hours a participant practices per week and their ranking. Our study showed an association between tennis groundstroke performance and physical but not cognitive outcomes in junior tennis players. Specific attention should be dedicated to developing the upper body strength of junior tennis players for improved groundstroke velocity and accuracy. This knowledge can assist tennis coaches in planning effective training sessions.

The impact of sleep behaviours, chronotype and time of match on the internal and external outcomes of a tennis match

“…The CFS has been commonly used to measure fatigue in general 37 and clinical 38 populations; however, only a few studies have used it in an athletic population. 39,40 Match analytics. A description of match analytics recorded during the match-play sessions is presented in Supplemental Table S2.…”

“…The CFS has been commonly used to measure fatigue in general 37 and clinical 38 populations; however, only a few studies have used it in an athletic population. 39,40…”

Does time of day and player chronotype impact tennis-specific skills and physical performance?

“…The tennis groundstroke assessment has shown good (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.88, standard error of measurement (SEM) = 2.35) test–retest reliability. 27 The assessment involves hitting 72 groundstrokes as hard and as accurately as possible into reference targets across three rounds. An experienced tennis coach fed ball to the players.…”

Improving The Muscle Strength Of The Lower Limbs In Junior Tennis

“…The speed with which the ball circulates in matches in competitions has increased significantly in recent years, so new methods and means of preparation must be found, also at the junior levels. Physical training must be done properly, starting from the junior level, the methods of training monitoring and control being studied by many researchers (Colomar et al, 2022;Gimenez-Egido et al, 2020;Roşculeţ et al, 2022;Turner et al, 2022).…”