2010
DOI: 10.1017/s1041610210001201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The association between late-life cognitive test scores and retrospective informant interview data

Abstract: Cognitive scores from retrospective informant interviews are strongly associated with late-life MMSE scores taken close to death. This suggests that the RInI can be used as a proxy measure of cognition in the period leading up to death.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two entire sub-cohorts were used to maintain the unbiased population-representative base of the study (Cambridge and Newcastle), totalling 183 cases Neuropathological lesions were previously assessed in this cohort, including AD-neuropathology using the CERAD protocol [ 23 ] and Braak NFT stage, based on immunohistochemistry and silver staining. Dementia status at death was based on all information available for each study participant, including algorithmic assessment in life (AGECAT), information from death certification and a Retrospective Informant Interview (RINI) developed by CFAS [ 20 , 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two entire sub-cohorts were used to maintain the unbiased population-representative base of the study (Cambridge and Newcastle), totalling 183 cases Neuropathological lesions were previously assessed in this cohort, including AD-neuropathology using the CERAD protocol [ 23 ] and Braak NFT stage, based on immunohistochemistry and silver staining. Dementia status at death was based on all information available for each study participant, including algorithmic assessment in life (AGECAT), information from death certification and a Retrospective Informant Interview (RINI) developed by CFAS [ 20 , 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32][33] In addition, some studies considered ZIP model as a good model for count outcome data, but these studies did not explore the ZINB model and couldn't compare the goodness of fit between ZIP model and ZINB model. [34][35][36][37][38] The number of sub-health symptoms had a wide range from 0 to 18, which aggravated its over-dispersion, so that both Poisson model and ZIP model fitted badly. In addition, two-fifth of zero counts weakened the goodness of fit of traditional NB model.…”
Section: Results Of Zinb Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What emerges from comparisons of the demographic and clinical characteristics of individuals still alive versus those who had died at the time of the first visit (Table 7) is that the failure to include information on deceased elderly would increasingly underestimate with age the prevalence of cognitive and functional disability in the elderly population. Retrospective interviews (on average two years after death) were shown to be sensitive instruments to detect the antemortem presence of dementia and were strongly associated with late-life MMSE scores taken close to death [32,75,76]. In the attempt to limit the attrition bias due to the expected high mortality rate and differential survival rates, a great effort was made at follow-ups to gather complete information also on participants who had died between two subsequent visits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%