The association between physician staff numbers and mortality in English hospitals

Abstract

Background Physician medical specialties place specific demands on medical staff. Often patients have multiple co-morbidities, frailty is common, and mortality rates are higher than other specialties such as surgery. The key intervention for patients admitted under physician subspecialties is the care provided on the ward. The current evidence base to inform staffing in physician medical specialty wards is limited. The aim of this analysis is to investigate the association between medical staffing levels within physician medical specialties and mortality. Methods This study is a cross-sectional analysis of national data, which is aggregated at provider level. Medical beds per senior, middle grade and junior physicians employed in physician medical specialties were calculated from national employment records for acute hospitals in England, in 2017. Outcome measures included unadjusted mortality rate and Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI) in physician medical specialties. Both Raw mortality and SHMI include deaths during admission or within 30 days following discharge. Linear regression models were constructed for each medical staffing grade for unadjusted mortality, SHMI and SHMI adjusted for local provider factors. Findings The mean number of medical beds per senior, middle grade and junior physicians were 7.3(SD 2.5), 19.7(11.5), 10.1(3.1) respectively. Lower bed numbers per medical staff grade were associated with lower than expected mortality by SHMI; senior(Coefficient 0.012(95%CI:0.005–0.018), p = 0.001), middle grade(0.002(0.0002–0.005), p = 0.032) and junior(0.008(0.002–0.015), p = 0.014). Hospital providers were more likely to achieve a better than expected mortality (SHMI<1) if beds per physician were lower than; 5.3, 14.6 and 9.0 for senior, middle grade and junior doctors respectively. Interpretation Acute hospital providers with fewer beds per medical staff of all grades are associated with lower than expected mortality. Funding No external funding is associated with this analysis.

Impact of staffing levels and resources of intensive care units on compliance to standard mechanical ventilator guidelines: A city‐wide study in times of COVID‐19 pandemic

“…Harvey and Trudgill have shown that fewer beds per physician are associated with decreased patient mortality. 4 Griffiths et al have shown that adequate registered nurse staffing also influences patient outcomes, and similar results have been reported by others. 16 Our results showed that both overall staffing levels and the number of ICU trained specialists were suboptimal.…”

“…Studies have shown that staffing patterns in ICUs affect patient outcomes. 3,4 Mechanical Ventilation (MV) is a significant life-saving intervention in ICUs. It is the indication that when the spontaneous ventilation of the patient is inadequate to sustain life.…”

The impact of management practices on relative patient mortality: Evidence from public hospitals

“… 33 The SHMI has been used widely in academic research as a measure of hospital mortality. 25 , 34 – 37 …”

“…33 The SHMI has been used widely in academic research as a measure of hospital mortality. 25,[34][35][36][37] We use SHMI for the years 2010/11 to 2014/15. For convenience, we multiply the SHMI by 100, so that the numbers can be interpreted as percentages of the baseline (i.e.…”

Association between nurse aide staffing and patient mortality after major cancer surgeries in acute care settings: A retrospective cohort study

“…The hospital‐level variables were hospital volume (≤287, 288–417, 418–595, and ≥596), type of hospital (academic or nonacademic), number of intensive care unit (ICU) beds (≤19 and >20), number of full‐time equivalent licensed nurses per 100 occupied beds (nurse to occupied bed ratio, ≤74 and >74 per 100 beds), and number of physicians per 100 occupied beds (physician to occupied bed ratio, ≤27 and >27 per 100 beds). We included the number of licensed nurses and physicians because this number is thought to affect patient outcomes (Harvey & Trudgill, 2021; McHugh et al, 2021) and, if not adjusted, may result in incorrect estimation of the effect of the number of nurse aides on patient outcomes.…”