2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-019-0150-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The association between self-reported depressive symptoms and the use of social networking sites (SNS): A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
4
42
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The existing literature mirrors the disagreement between scholars arguing that SNT use is positively correlated with depressive symptoms and those who claim the opposite—that SNT users (and especially active users who maintain constructive online social relationships) exhibit low levels of depressive symptoms. Moreover, as in this study, almost every investigation in this domain has also documented null results, according to which depression was not related to multiple SNT features (for a recent systematic review, see Frost & Rickwood, 2017; for a meta-analysis, see Vahedi & Zannella, 2019). Interestingly, many researchers have begun to search for a third, mediating variable that can explain the complex relationships between depression and SNT use, such as negative social comparisons or maladaptive ruminative behaviors (Frost & Rickwood, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The existing literature mirrors the disagreement between scholars arguing that SNT use is positively correlated with depressive symptoms and those who claim the opposite—that SNT users (and especially active users who maintain constructive online social relationships) exhibit low levels of depressive symptoms. Moreover, as in this study, almost every investigation in this domain has also documented null results, according to which depression was not related to multiple SNT features (for a recent systematic review, see Frost & Rickwood, 2017; for a meta-analysis, see Vahedi & Zannella, 2019). Interestingly, many researchers have begun to search for a third, mediating variable that can explain the complex relationships between depression and SNT use, such as negative social comparisons or maladaptive ruminative behaviors (Frost & Rickwood, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Many studies and meta-analyses find a small negative association between social media use and well-being of about r = − 0.15 to r = − 0.10, while the correlations fall to about r = − 0.10 to r = − 0.05 in some work lauded as being more transparent [42,43]. Correlations and observed effects in this ballpark have been shown in meta-analytic studies considering anxiety and depressive outcomes (e.g., [28,38,64,75]), but have also been found in longitudinal research [5,22,33,41,47] and experimental work [2]. As mentioned above, it is still unclear what such a range of effects can tell us about well-being and how it is affected by social media use.…”
Section: Small Negative Associations Between Screens Social Media Anmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Furthermore, the evidence is low-quality and cross-sectional in nature [24,38]. Reviews have found small correlations between social media use and depressive symptoms [24,68] that (if numerically provided) range from r = 0.11 [75] and r = 0.13 [38] to r = 0.17 [64]. Another meta-analysis found no significant relationship between social media use and well-being (r < − 0.01, [28]).…”
Section: Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excessive selfdisclosure in SNSs has become a means of connecting with and supporting each other while practicing social distancing during the pandemic (Gao et al 2020;Nabity-Grover et al 2020). Studies have shown that while self-disclosure and active interaction with others might be related to better wellbeing and positive mental states, excessive SNS engagement could be associated with poor well-being, loneliness, anxiety, and depression (Hunt et al 2018;Liu et al 2019;Reer et al 2019;Vahedi and Zannella 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%