The Association Between Sensemaking During Physician Team Rounds and Hospitalized Patients’ Outcomes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sensemaking is the social act of assigning meaning to ambiguous events. It is recognized as a means to achieve high reliability. We sought to assess sensemaking in daily patient care through examining how inpatient teams round and discuss patients. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to assess the association between inpatient physician team sensemaking and hospitalized patients' outcomes, including length of stay (LOS), unnecessary length of stay (ULOS), and complication rates. DESIGN: Eleven inpatient medicine teams' daily rounds were observed for 2 to 4 weeks. Rounds were audiotaped, and field notes taken. Four patient discussions per team were assessed using a standardized Situation, Task, Intent, Concern, Calibrate (STICC) framework. PARTICIPANTS: Inpatient physician teams at the teaching hospitals affiliated with the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio participated in the study. Outcomes of patients admitted to the teams were included. MAIN MEASURES: Sensemaking was assessed based on the order in which patients were seen, purposeful rounding, patient-driven rounding, and individual patient discussions. We assigned teams a score based on the number of STICC elements used in the four patient discussions sampled. The association between sensemaking and outcomes was assessed using Kruskal-Wallis sum rank and Dunn's tests. KEY RESULTS: Teams rounded in several different ways. Five teams rounded purposefully, and four based rounds on patient-driven needs. Purposeful and patient-driven rounds were significantly associated with lower complication rates. Varying the order in which patients were seen and purposefully rounding were significantly associated with lower LOS, and purposeful and patient-driven rounds associated with lower ULOS. Use of a greater number of STICC elements was associated with significantly lower LOS (4.6 vs. 5.7, p=0.01), ULOS (0.3 vs. 0.6, p=0.02), and complications (0.2 vs. 0.5, p=0.0001).CONCLUSIONS: Improving sensemaking may be a strategy for improving patient outcomes, fostering a shared understanding of a patient's clinical trajectory, and enabling high reliability.

Making sense of blood glucose data and self‐management in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A qualitative study

“…Mental models are mental representations of “how things work” that individuals refer to when interacting with their environment (Sieck, Klein, Peluso, Smith, & Harris‐Thompson, 2007). Pre‐existing mental models are shaped by past experiences and expectations (Leykum et al., 2015). Action is the resultant carrying out of activities in response to the new information (Mamykina et al., 2015).…”

Service and Education: The Association Between Workload, Patient Complexity, and Teaching on Internal Medicine Inpatient Services

“…As part of a series of studies examining relationships and sensemaking [13][14][15] among inpatient medicine teams, we analyzed team data from a single residency program at two large teaching hospitals (an urban county hospital and a Department of Veterans Affairs [VA] hospital). A complete description of the methods involving the first 11 teams observed has been published elsewhere.…”

Practicing Medicine with Colleagues: Pitfalls from Social Psychology Science

“…In both cases, more careful observation and thoughtful attention to situational factors is required for an accurate assessment of how much to trust another colleague. 11 The required detective work is made more difficult because the colleagues, themselves, may be unaware of the relevant situational factors, may underestimate or overestimate such factors, or may feel too awkward to discuss such influences openly. 12 Clinicians need to guard against the tendency to make unwarranted negative attributions about a colleague's trustworthiness based on an observation of a single instance of a medical mistake.…”