2016
DOI: 10.1002/nau.23162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The association between the ICIQ‐LUTS and the ICIQ‐bladder diary in assessing LUTS

Abstract: The ICIQ-BD is a simple, cheap, valid, and reliable method to assess LUTS in everyday clinical practice. However, an agreement between the ICIQ-BD and the ICIQ-MLUTS/FLUTS with regards to daytime frequency and nocturia episode is weak and therefore both are needed in the assessment of patients with LUTS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible bias must be considered, on account of BD use may lead to a bladder training effect and nights during recording have evidenced relevant variations in the frequency of nocturnal voids. Despite that, it continues to be one of the most important and simplest tools to access LUTS, setting more confidence to the diagnosis commonly overestimated by DVSS (20).…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A possible bias must be considered, on account of BD use may lead to a bladder training effect and nights during recording have evidenced relevant variations in the frequency of nocturnal voids. Despite that, it continues to be one of the most important and simplest tools to access LUTS, setting more confidence to the diagnosis commonly overestimated by DVSS (20).…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These scores have little relevance in clinical practice; however, they are important tools in clinical investigation, particularly with respect to standardizing the terms used and as a guide for professionals with less experience. They are complementary tools to BD, in order to evaluate not only the actual voiding but also the self-reported behavior, a direct reflection of how LUTD impacts (20).…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validated questionnaires such as the International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire (ICIQ), the ICIQ-MLUTS, the ICIQ-FLUTS (for males and females, respectively), and the ICIQ-BD, are recommended for patients with LUTS during the initial assessment as they can both quantify symptoms and identify the types of symptoms that predominate. 18…”
Section: Patient Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Self-reported measures of urinary symptoms are much faster to complete, but it is also not known whether these are sufficient to establish a clear clinical picture or if the diary is also needed. 12 Some studies that have compared bladder diaries and symptom scores derived from self-report items suggest that the bladder diary is superfluous at least for overactive bladder 5 and incontinence 7 in women, but this needs to be assessed in a larger mixed sex population with different LUTS. The primary aim of this study was to describe the completeness and accuracy of a three-day bladder diary in a large cohort of men and women seeking care for LUTS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have assessed the utility of bladder diaries but most were limited by inclusion of single‐sex, a single disease process, or a small study population . Self‐reported measures of urinary symptoms are much faster to complete, but it is also not known whether these are sufficient to establish a clear clinical picture or if the diary is also needed . Some studies that have compared bladder diaries and symptom scores derived from self‐report items suggest that the bladder diary is superfluous at least for overactive bladder and incontinence in women, but this needs to be assessed in a larger mixed sex population with different LUTS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%