2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The association between therapeutic alliance and outcome in internet-based psychological interventions: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
58
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
6
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive relationship between the therapeutic alliance and treatment outcomes indicates that the type of alliance that emerges in text-based digital psychotherapy is indeed beneficial to the therapeutic work. The finding that many studies found a significant and moderate relationship between the alliance and treatment outcomes is also in accordance with a previous meta-analysis on the alliance-outcome association in digital psychotherapy that found a significant overall correlation of r = 0.28 (15), as well as a more recent meta-analysis on the same topic that found a significant overall correlation of r = 0.20 (19). Since the research on this topic was until recently very limited (10), our review provides the necessary update on the working alliance in this evolving and growing field.…”
Section: Quality Of the Therapeutic Alliance And Alliance-outcome Relationshipsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The positive relationship between the therapeutic alliance and treatment outcomes indicates that the type of alliance that emerges in text-based digital psychotherapy is indeed beneficial to the therapeutic work. The finding that many studies found a significant and moderate relationship between the alliance and treatment outcomes is also in accordance with a previous meta-analysis on the alliance-outcome association in digital psychotherapy that found a significant overall correlation of r = 0.28 (15), as well as a more recent meta-analysis on the same topic that found a significant overall correlation of r = 0.20 (19). Since the research on this topic was until recently very limited (10), our review provides the necessary update on the working alliance in this evolving and growing field.…”
Section: Quality Of the Therapeutic Alliance And Alliance-outcome Relationshipsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, therapists report less confidence in their abilities to develop a functional therapeutic alliance in internet-based psychotherapy (17). In contrast with this, research on internet-based cognitive behavior therapy suggests the quality of the therapeutic alliance, most commonly rated by the client, to be at least as strong as in face-to-face therapy and also highlights the association of the alliance with online treatment outcome (15,18,19).…”
Section: The (Digital) Therapeutic Alliancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mental health professionals still share concerns about whether online consultations are useful for their work, for example, concerning relational aspects, working with non-verbal behavior and emotions, performing certain assessments or interventions, or working with certain populations. Such concerns are not new (e.g., Stallard et al, 2010 ), but accumulating evidence shows the relevance of the therapeutic relationship in e-mental health ( Kaiser et al, 2021 ) and suggests the equivalence of relational aspects in different modes of delivery ( Irvine et al, 2020 ). Online consultations also appear feasible across different diagnostic groups and capable of reaching similar clinical outcomes as compared to conventional treatment ( Chiauzzi et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive e-therapy therapeutic alliances were significantly associated with positive treatment outcomes. Building on the acceptance of the ability to form virtual therapeutic alliances, calls to pay specific attention to the selection and utilization of ICTs in e-therapy establishing this relationship have emerged (Kaiser et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%