The association of active smoking with multiple cancers: national census-cancer registry cohorts with quantitative bias analysis

Abstract

Purposes (1) Determine the association of multiple cancers with smoking, focusing on cancers with an uncertain association; and (2) illustrate quantitative bias analysis as applied to registry data, to adjust for misclassification of smoking and residual confounding by alcohol and obesity. Methods New Zealand 1981 and 1996 censuses, including smoking questions, were linked to cancer registry data giving 14.8 million person-years of follow-up. Rate ratios (RR) for current versus never smokers, adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity and socioeconomic factors were calculated and then subjected to quantitative bias analysis. Results RR estimates for lung, larynx (including ear and nasosinus), and bladder cancers adjusted for measured confounders and exposure misclassification were 9.28 (95 % uncertainty interval 8.31-10.4), 6.14 (4.55-8.30), and 2.22 (1.94-2.55), respectively. Moderate associations were found for cervical (1.82; 1.51-2.20), kidney (1.29; 1.07-1.56), liver cancer (1.75; 1.37-2.24; European only), esophageal (2.14; 1.73-2.65), oropharyngeal (2.30; 1.94-2.72), pancreatic (1.68; 1.44-1.96), and stomach cancers (1.42; 1.22-1.66). Protective associations were found for endometrial (0.67; 0.56-0.79) and melanoma (0.72; 0.65-0.81), and borderline association for thyroid (0.76; 0.58-1.00), colon (0.89; and CML (0.66;. Remaining cancers had near null associations. Adjustment for residual confounding suggested little impact, except the RRs for endometrial, kidney, and esophageal cancers were slightly increased, and the oropharyngeal and liver (European/other) RRs were decreased. Conclusions Our large study confirms the strong association of smoking with many cancers and strengthens the evidence for protective associations with thyroid cancer and melanoma. With large data sets, considering and adjusting for residual systematic error is as important as quantifying random error.

Socioeconomic and lifestyle factors and melanoma: a systematic review

“…Inverse associations have been shown between cigarette smoking and melanoma risk and mortality in two grade A and five grade B studies . Data from these studies indicate that current smokers have lower incidence and lower mortality from melanoma.…”

Smokers with chronic myeloid leukemia are at a higher risk of disease progression and premature death

“…[1][2][3][4] However, to the best of our knowledge, it is currently not clear whether smoking also is an unfavorable prognostic factor. [1][2][3][4] However, to the best of our knowledge, it is currently not clear whether smoking also is an unfavorable prognostic factor.…”

Smoking and microRNA dysregulation: a cancerous combination

“…In particular, the effects of CS on miRNA expression and their bio-regulatory machinery are of great scientific interest [4]. Cigarette-smoking is an important risk factor for multiple human pathologies [5,6]; among them lung cancer (LC) takes the lead with smokers having much higher risk than non-smokers [7]. We are now beginning to understand the role of smoke-induced altered miRNA expression in cancer.…”