2011
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-2559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Association of BMI Status With Adolescent Preventive Screening

Abstract: Obese adolescents receive more preventive screening versus their normal-weight peers. Overweight adolescents do not report more screening, but standards of care dictate increased attention for this group. These results are discouraging amid a rise in pediatric obesity and new guidelines that recommend screening by BMI status.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar strategies of pooling data across survey years have been used to look at dietary behaviors and other health behaviors and outcomes. 18,19 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar strategies of pooling data across survey years have been used to look at dietary behaviors and other health behaviors and outcomes. 18,19 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of receipt of clinical preventive services among AYAs, based on clinician [ 31 33 ] and patient/caregiver report [ 34 39 ], suggest suboptimal levels. Only 40% of sexually active 15- to 21-year-old females reported receiving a chlamydia test in the prior year (2006–2010 data [ 40 ]), and only 66% of pediatricians in a 2012 national survey reported counseling most of their adolescent patients about tobacco use [ 41 ].…”
Section: Clinical Preventive Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other positive predictors for identification included female gender and non-Hispanic ethnicity. A higher rate of physician identification for obesity has been reported previously among females (25)(26)(27). Females may be more likely than males to share their concerns about their weight with their physicians, thus prompting greater identification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%