2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2015.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The association of level of reduction of Wilms’ tumor gene 1 mRNA transcript in bone marrow and outcome in acute myeloid leukemia patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the end, we cannot say that one is clearly better than the other and we have seen that both methods are useful to stratify patients at high risk of relapse as similarly reported by other Authors [32][33][34]. These results have been confirmed by other groups, who reported the power of WT1 monitoring in detecting patients at high risk of relapse, but no conclusive data are available concerning the cut-off for positive versus negative samples, as well as the optimal time-point for its assessment [23,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. Concerning this latter point, data coming from the published studies are not conclusive.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the end, we cannot say that one is clearly better than the other and we have seen that both methods are useful to stratify patients at high risk of relapse as similarly reported by other Authors [32][33][34]. These results have been confirmed by other groups, who reported the power of WT1 monitoring in detecting patients at high risk of relapse, but no conclusive data are available concerning the cut-off for positive versus negative samples, as well as the optimal time-point for its assessment [23,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. Concerning this latter point, data coming from the published studies are not conclusive.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Concerning this latter point, data coming from the published studies are not conclusive. In particular, a very early time-point for WT1 monitoring (postinduction) [15,35,[36][37][38][39][41][42][43], but also a later time-point (postconsolidation or pre-allo-SCT) [38,[41][42][43] have been reported to significantly predict the outcome. Concerning LAIP-MFC sensitivity and efficiency, our data are concordant with those reported by the GIMEMA group and suggest that the most accurate predictive time-point of MRD assessment is probably after consolidation [14,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eighty-one distinct publications including 11 151 patients were included in this analysis (17 studies for OS, 20 studies for DFS, and 44 for both outcomes). These studies formed the basis of our statistical analyses . The characteristics of the individual studies are presented in eTable 1 in the Supplement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that >60% of AML patients lack specific molecular targets, and it is therefore important to identify alternative molecular markers applicable for the majority of AML patients ( 13 ). Retrospective analysis of cohorts of previous studies identified that quantification of WT1 mRNA in BM specimens may be used as a marker of MRD and predict a relapse of AML after allogeneic HSCT ( 14 , 15 ). Marjanovic et al ( 16 ) confirmed that WT1 transcript levels were associated with clinical remission and relapse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%