2014
DOI: 10.1111/tan.12364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The association of HLA‐DRB1 and HLA‐DQB1 alleles with the development of factor VIII inhibitors in severe haemophilia A patients in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A previously reported study from India in severe haemophilia A (n = 119) did not find any association with any of the HLA alleles and risk of inhibitor formation . In contrast, our data suggest and increased risk of inhibitor formation with HLA DRB1*13 and this significance was retained in the high‐titre subset.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…A previously reported study from India in severe haemophilia A (n = 119) did not find any association with any of the HLA alleles and risk of inhibitor formation . In contrast, our data suggest and increased risk of inhibitor formation with HLA DRB1*13 and this significance was retained in the high‐titre subset.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Overall, in this study, with regard to the HLA-DRB1*03 allele (P-value 0.3048; OR 0.2857; 95% CI 0.03590-2.274), earlier found to be protective with regard to FVIII inhibitors [24], and with regard to the IL10 GCC haplotypes (P-value 0.8223; OR 0.8529; 95% CI 0.3430-2.121) earlier found to be a risk factor [23], in Indian congenital HA patients, there was no significant difference between those who developed antinuclear antibodies and those who did not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…immune response polymorphisms, HLA genotypes, F8 inversions & causative mutations were also analysed in the severe haemophilia A patients using a variety of molecular typing assays (PCR, RFLP-PAGE, DNA sequencing, HLA-SSP typing, CSGE, MLPA) described earlier [23][24][25][26]. These were correlated with non-genetic risk factors such as the treatment-related risk factors from the details available in the clinical proforma of the patients.…”
Section: Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%