“…This latter notion is supported by the result that discontinuous, incongruent imaginary content in terms of plot, character, objects or actions accounted for the largest component of cognitive bizarreness during LSD (Figure 2). Furthermore, this is supported by a growing body of literature (Sweat et al 2016, Baggott 2015, Sessa 2008, Leuner 1973 indicating that psychedelics induce a state of broadened consciousness that is associated with a different cognitive style, including facilitated access to remote semantic associations (Family et al 2016, Spitzer et al 1996, Rittenhouse et al 1994; cross-modal fusion between sensory modalities (synaesthesia), perception and feeling (physiognomic perception) and imagery and perception (eidetic imagery) (Terhune et al 2016, Sinke et al 2012, Glicksohn 1992; thinking in metaphors and symbols (Lakoff 1993, Martindale and Fischer 1977, Landon and Fischer 1970; enhanced problem solving capabilities (Frecska et al 2012, Sio et al 2013, Ullrich et al 2004; and increased topographically long-range neuronal connectivity in the brain (Achermann et al 2016, Petri et al 2014, Massimini et al 2010. Taken together, these findings suggest that creative thinking may be an important mechanism behind cognitive bizarreness, where there is increased binding of logically incompatible, but associatively remotely connected, features into new phenomenological Gestalts (Rittenhouse et al 1994).…”