2020
DOI: 10.1111/mafi.12292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The asymptotic expansion of the regular discretization error of Itô integrals

Abstract: We study an Edgeworth‐type refinement of the central limit theorem for the discretization error of Itô integrals. Toward this end, we introduce a new approach, based on the anticipating Itô formula. This alternative technique allows us to compute explicitly the terms of the corresponding expansion formula. Two applications to finance are given; the asymptotics of discrete hedging error under the Black–Scholes model and the difference between continuously and discretely monitored variance swap payoffs under sto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof of Proposition 3.5. We only do the proof of point (2), since the proof of point (1) (which requires to show that (u, P ) with P s := D s u s verifies the assumptions of Theorem 1.2) is very similar and easier. Before going into the details, let us explain the main steps we are going to follow:…”
Section: Multiple Wiener-itô Integralsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Proof of Proposition 3.5. We only do the proof of point (2), since the proof of point (1) (which requires to show that (u, P ) with P s := D s u s verifies the assumptions of Theorem 1.2) is very similar and easier. Before going into the details, let us explain the main steps we are going to follow:…”
Section: Multiple Wiener-itô Integralsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework of Theorem 1.2 is general (assuming that the pair (u, P ) belongs to C 1 and satisfies other technical conditions) and concerns the convergence of M n,i,j as n → ∞ in probability, towards an identified limit. The situation where H > 1 2 differs significantly from H = 1 2 , because in this latter case M n,i,j converges in law (but not in probability, because of the creation of an independent alea, see e.g. (1.1)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations