2024
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/acff5f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravitational Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters

Mathew S. Madhavacheril,
Frank J. Qu,
Blake D. Sherwin
et al.

Abstract: We present cosmological constraints from a gravitational lensing mass map covering 9400 deg2 reconstructed from measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) made by the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) from 2017 to 2021. In combination with measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and big bang nucleosynthesis, we obtain the clustering amplitude σ 8 = 0.819 ± 0.015 at 1.8% precision, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We discuss our results in Section 9 and conclude in Section 10. This paper is part of a larger set of ACT DR6 papers and is accompanied by two others: Madhavacheril et al (2024) present the released DR6 CMB lensing mass map and explore the consequences for cosmology from the combination and comparison of our measurements with external data; MacCrann et al (2024) investigate the levels of foreground biasesarguably the most significant potential source of systematic errors-and ensure that these are well controlled in our analysis.…”
Section: Summary Of Key Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We discuss our results in Section 9 and conclude in Section 10. This paper is part of a larger set of ACT DR6 papers and is accompanied by two others: Madhavacheril et al (2024) present the released DR6 CMB lensing mass map and explore the consequences for cosmology from the combination and comparison of our measurements with external data; MacCrann et al (2024) investigate the levels of foreground biasesarguably the most significant potential source of systematic errors-and ensure that these are well controlled in our analysis.…”
Section: Summary Of Key Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data used in this analysis initially cover approximately 19,000 deg 2 before Galactic cuts are applied and have a total inverse variance of 0.55 nK −2 for the nighttime data. Figure 3 68 The degeneracy between σ 8 and Ω m prevents strong constraints on either of these parameters individually, and indeed (although we report them in the figure caption) any such constraints derived will depend strongly on the prior ranges; in order to break the degeneracy between these two parameters, we combine with BAO as shown in the companion paper (Madhavacheril et al 2024). 69 In the following, we denote them f030, f040, f090, f150, and f220.…”
Section: Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations