2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2105.05267
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Microwave Intensity and Polarization Maps of the Galactic Center

Yilun Guan,
Susan E. Clark,
Brandon S. Hensley
et al.

Abstract: We present arcminute-resolution intensity and polarization maps of the Galactic center made with the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT). The maps cover a 32 deg 2 field at 98, 150, and 224 GHz with |l| ≤ 4 • , |b| ≤ 2 • . We combine these data with Planck observations at similar frequencies to create coadded maps with increased sensitivity at large angular scales. With the coadded maps, we are able to

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In prototypical Seyfert NGC 1068 all these ionizers are operating on < 100-pc radius within its 1 kpc star-forming ring. Figure 2(d) highlights remarkable similarities between NGC 1068 radio structures and those in our GC: a core region delineated by elliptical green contours at ∼ 60 pc radius that coincides with the bundle of vertical non-thermal, strongly polarized radio filaments (Guan et al 2021) in the MW that delineates its radio shells, knots in the compact jet within that have the same scale as the X-ray extension, radio lobes, and Galactic Center Lobe in the MW, and blobs at the end of the NGC 1068 jet that distend to become the NE bow-shaped radio lobe at the same scale as the FB in the MW. The latter shape with adjacent optical and X-ray emission signifies a radiative, detached bow shock formed when a supersonic jet encounters a rapid decline in ambient pressure.…”
Section: Comparison With the Seyfert Ngc 1068 Outflowmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In prototypical Seyfert NGC 1068 all these ionizers are operating on < 100-pc radius within its 1 kpc star-forming ring. Figure 2(d) highlights remarkable similarities between NGC 1068 radio structures and those in our GC: a core region delineated by elliptical green contours at ∼ 60 pc radius that coincides with the bundle of vertical non-thermal, strongly polarized radio filaments (Guan et al 2021) in the MW that delineates its radio shells, knots in the compact jet within that have the same scale as the X-ray extension, radio lobes, and Galactic Center Lobe in the MW, and blobs at the end of the NGC 1068 jet that distend to become the NE bow-shaped radio lobe at the same scale as the FB in the MW. The latter shape with adjacent optical and X-ray emission signifies a radiative, detached bow shock formed when a supersonic jet encounters a rapid decline in ambient pressure.…”
Section: Comparison With the Seyfert Ngc 1068 Outflowmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…To the north, the X-ray pattern offsets east of similar radio continuum emission (Heywood et al 2019;Ponti et al 2021). The enigmatic, vertical bundle of flux tubes (Guan et al 2021) at 15 radius east may confine the X-ray emission, which at least in the north protrudes farther eastward once the filaments end. To the south, radio synchrotron 1-2 Myr old appears to envelop the X-rays (Nakashima et al 2013;Ponti et al 2013).…”
Section: Bubbles and Channelsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It has been observed in the polarization data of many, if not all, instruments measuring polarization. Some procedures have been proposed to subtract the effect from the data, for instruments such as NIKA2 ( [27]), ACTPol ( [41]) or HAWC+ ( [30]). The origin of the effect is unclear, but observations suggest that it is due to the propagation of light in the instrument.…”
Section: Leakagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these observations were made with arcminute-scale resolutions compared to the arcsecondscale resolutions of Paré et al (2019). It is possible that the alternating magnetic field pattern observed for the Radio Arc NTFs in Paré et al (2019) can only be discerned with a arcsecond-scale spatial resolution, and the alternating pattern is undetectable in Guan et al (2021) and Ruud et al (2015) due to the much larger beam sizes of those observations. Furthermore, Faraday rotation is less significant at these higher frequencies, since it scales with λ 2 , and so these observations could be observing the polarization emitted by the NTFs without experiencing significant Faraday effects.…”
Section: Possible Alternative Mechanisms Producing Alternating Magnet...mentioning
confidence: 99%