Background:
Atrial fibrillation has been identified as an independent
risk factor for thromboembolic events. Since 1948 different surgical techniques
have described the feasibility and the rationale of left atrial surgical
appendage closure. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the reported
patency rates of different surgical techniques.
Methods:
This systematic
review was conducted according to preferred reporting items for systematic
reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two independent investigators
searched the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of
Controlled Trials, and OVID® (Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den
Rijn, Netherlands) to identify relevant studies. Consecutively, a PICO
(Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes) strategy assessment of
literature was performed to search eventual other relevant studies that may have
been ignored.
Results:
A total of 42 studies were included in our
analysis. The total number of patients who underwent surgical left atrial
appendage closure was 5671, and in 61.2% an imaging follow up was performed,
mostly with transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation. Success rate for the
different techniques was: Clip deployment 98%; Lariat procedure 88%; Surgical
amputation 91%; Endocardial suture 74.3%, Epicardial suture 65%; Left atrial
appendage closure (LAAC) ligation 60.9%; Stapler technique with excision of left
atrial appendage (LAA) 100%; Stapler without excision 70%.
Conclusions:
To date, data on surgical left atrial appendage closure are
poor and not standardized, even if reported rates are acceptable and comparable
to transcatheter procedures. If validated on large-scale non-retrospective and
multicentric studies, these promising developments may offer a valuable
alternative for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and ineligible for oral
anticoagulation therapy.