2020
DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10503391.1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The atmospheric boundary layer and surface conditions during katabatic wind events over the Terra Nova Bay Polynya.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study is an analysis of the thermodynamic and dynamic forcing that occurred within the katabatic wind jet over the TNBP. Although this study focuses solely on this one case, it was similar to the two other polynya transect cases performed during PIPERS (results not shown), the September 19, 2012 case from Wenta and Cassano (2020), and the cases described by Parish and Bromwich (1989), and was likely to have had many of the same characteristics as the lower atmosphere in other ACP situations. Following this introduction, Section 2 describes the theory and methods used to perform the thermodynamic analyses.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study is an analysis of the thermodynamic and dynamic forcing that occurred within the katabatic wind jet over the TNBP. Although this study focuses solely on this one case, it was similar to the two other polynya transect cases performed during PIPERS (results not shown), the September 19, 2012 case from Wenta and Cassano (2020), and the cases described by Parish and Bromwich (1989), and was likely to have had many of the same characteristics as the lower atmosphere in other ACP situations. Following this introduction, Section 2 describes the theory and methods used to perform the thermodynamic analyses.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Further evidence suggesting sea spray enhancement of SHF in over ACPs comes from the September 19, 2012 case by Wenta and Cassano (2020). Although they did not publish any SHF estimates, the values displayed in their Figure 7 can be used to estimate SHF using the integral method, Equation , and ignoring radiation, entrainment and snow effects.…”
Section: Summary Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To judge how representative this case was, it was compared other known similar in situ measurements, in particular, the 19 September downwind transect case from Wenta and Cassano (2020), hereafter referred to as W&C, and also the two other TNB transects performed during the PIPERS cruise on May 1, 2017 and May 5, 2017 (“1May’ and “5May”), all of which shared many similarities. For all four transects, at all downwind locations, there were low level jets with cores occurring between 150 and 300 m elevation and enhanced wind speeds occurring up to ∼700 m elevation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biggest challenge is accurately representing the surface conditions, in particular the surface temperature of the sea ice and exposed ocean T sfc , which is highly variable in ACP regions. For example, Wenta and Cassano (2020) showed that AMPS had errors in the low‐level atmospheric structure predictions due to incorrect T sfc calculations. Another challenge for numerical simulations of ACPs is the representation of a variety of microphysical processes such sea spray production, sea spray freezing and sea ice formation, all of which can potentially have major impacts on the surface fluxes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%