1999
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.16.001554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The atoms of vision: Cartesian or polar?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of cooperative coding will give rise to a certain form of statistical dependency among coefficients-namely, a circularly symmetric, non-factorial distribution. Such distributions were first described by Zetzsche et al, 10 who observed that the responses of pairs of Gabor functions in quadrature phase have a circularly symmetric, yet sparse (non-Gaussian), joint distribution. This structure suggests that pairs of such filter outputs are better described in polar coordinates-i.e., in terms of amplitude and phase-rather than cartesian coordinates (the responses of individual filers).…”
Section: Stable Representation Via Amplitude and Phase Factorizationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This type of cooperative coding will give rise to a certain form of statistical dependency among coefficients-namely, a circularly symmetric, non-factorial distribution. Such distributions were first described by Zetzsche et al, 10 who observed that the responses of pairs of Gabor functions in quadrature phase have a circularly symmetric, yet sparse (non-Gaussian), joint distribution. This structure suggests that pairs of such filter outputs are better described in polar coordinates-i.e., in terms of amplitude and phase-rather than cartesian coordinates (the responses of individual filers).…”
Section: Stable Representation Via Amplitude and Phase Factorizationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This was first noted with regard to pairwise joint statistics of Gabor filters of differing phase (Wegmann & Zetzsche, 1990), and later extended to filters at nearby positions, orientations and scales (Zetzsche & Krieger, 1999;Wainwright & Simoncelli, 2000). As a result, many recent models of local image statistics are members of the elliptically symmetric family (Zetzsche & Krieger, 1999;Huang & Mumford, 1999;Wainwright & Simoncelli, 2000;Hyvärinen et al, 2001;Parra et al, 2001;Srivastava et al, 2002;Sendur & Selesnick, 2002;Portilla et al, 2003;Teh et al, 2003;Gehler & Welling, 2006). This suggests that radial gaussianization may be an appropriate methodology for eliminating statistical dependencies in local image regions.…”
Section: Local Image Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We introduce an alternative nonlinear procedure, which we call radial gaussianization (RG), whereby the norms of whitened signal vectors are nonlinearly adjusted to ensure that the resulting output density is a spherical gaussian, whose components are thus statistically independent. We apply our methodology to natural images, whose local statistics have been modeled by a variety of different ESDs (Zetzsche & Krieger, 1999;Wainwright & Simoncelli, 2000;Huang & Mumford, 1999;Parra, Spence, & Sajda, 2001;Hyvärinen, Hoyer, & Inki, 2001;Srivastava, Liu, & Grenander, 2002;Sendur & Selesnick, 2002;Portilla, Strela, Wainwright, & Simoncelli, 2003;Teh, Welling, & Osindero, 2003;Gehler & Welling, 2006). We show that RG produces much more substantial reductions in dependency, as measured with multi-information of pairs or blocks of nearby bandpass filter responses, than does ICA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations at the neurobiological level are supported by human psychophysics. The sensitivity of human observers to quadrature pair Gabor stimuli is aligned with a polar decomposition and not a Cartesian decomposition (Zetzsche et al, 1999). In sum, these observations strongly advocate the use of angular decompositions, such as those that can be obtained with complex variables, in models of natural images.…”
Section: First Layer: Sparse and Temporally Persistent Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This step is motivated by a number of findings from natural scene statistics, neurophysiology, and human psychophysics and draws heavily from the work of Christoph Zetzsche described in Zetzsche, Krieger, & Wegmann (1999). In particular, we are motivated by two observations: The first is that although the prior over the coefficients in sparse coding models is typically factorial, the actual joint distribution of coefficients, even after learning, exhibits strong statistical dependencies in response to natural images.…”
Section: First Layer: Sparse and Temporally Persistent Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%