2020
DOI: 10.2308/horizons-19-133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Attenuating Effect of Intelligent Agents and Agent Autonomy on Managers' Ability to Diffuse Responsibility for and Engage in Earnings Management

Abstract: Advances in IT suggest that computerized intelligent agents (IAs) may soon occupy many roles that presently employ human agents. A significant concern is the ethical conduct of those who use IAs, including their possible utilization by managers to engage in earnings management. We investigate how financial reporting decisions are affected when they are supported by the work of an IA versus a human agent, with varying autonomy. In an experiment with experienced managers, we vary agent type (human vs. IA) and au… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent research provides qualitative field evidence on how D&A audit approaches are perceived by auditors, peer reviewers, and standard setters (Austin et al, 2021; Christ et al, 2021; Walker & Brown‐Liburd, 2019). In addition, experimental research focuses on how D&A tools influence auditor judgments (Anderson et al, 2021; Barr‐Pulliam et al, 2020; Bibler et al, 2023; Commerford et al, 2022; Koreff & Perreault, 2023; Peters, 2023) and on how auditors' use of D&A tools influences investor, manager, juror, and peer reviewer judgments (Ballou et al, 2021; Barr‐Pulliam et al, 2022; Kipp et al, 2020).…”
Section: Institutional Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent research provides qualitative field evidence on how D&A audit approaches are perceived by auditors, peer reviewers, and standard setters (Austin et al, 2021; Christ et al, 2021; Walker & Brown‐Liburd, 2019). In addition, experimental research focuses on how D&A tools influence auditor judgments (Anderson et al, 2021; Barr‐Pulliam et al, 2020; Bibler et al, 2023; Commerford et al, 2022; Koreff & Perreault, 2023; Peters, 2023) and on how auditors' use of D&A tools influences investor, manager, juror, and peer reviewer judgments (Ballou et al, 2021; Barr‐Pulliam et al, 2022; Kipp et al, 2020).…”
Section: Institutional Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This point is made because there has been very little research done on the quality of accounting information. This is because issues over regulation and transparency are still matters that are up for debate [1].…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve a company's financial performance, it is critical to have a high-quality audit, which helps build trust in financial reporting [1]. Companies depend on the financial information provided by the company's management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%