The Attributes of Effective NGOs and the Leadership Values Associated with a Reputation for Organizational Effectiveness

Abstract

Building on prior research characterizing organizational effectiveness as a social construction, this article identifies the perceived attributes of effective transnational nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the leadership values associated with higher reputations for organizational effectiveness. Results are based on an in‐depth, mixed‐method interview study of 152 NGO leaders located in the United States and representing all major sectors of organizational activity. Among the twenty‐nine attributes that leaders identified in peer organizations that they regarded as particularly effective, leaders stressed instantiation of sound principles or strategy, a grassroots approach, large organizational size and resources, being collaborative, singleness of focus, campaigning abilities, funding and fundraising prowess, global scope, and quality people. Furthermore, statistical analysis reveals that NGOs with leaders who value similarities with peer organizations, grassroots approaches, diversity of strategies, dedication, professionalism, and distributed organizational structures have significantly higher reputations for effectiveness.

Professionalization and Voluntary Transparency Practices in Nonprofit Organizations

“…The effects of comprehensive public disclosure for the performance of a nonprofit are uncertain, and no interviewee was able to name any specific benefits. However, any actual effects of transparency appear to be irrelevant for the perception of a nonprofit as effective: peers judge an organization's effectiveness based on structural and procedural properties rather than outcomes (Mitchell ). Transparency is an important measure of peer recognition. …”

Analyzing the effectiveness of a Kenyan NGO with the HPO Framework

“…Mitchell () postulated that an NGO's reputation for effectiveness is a substitute for the effectiveness of an NGO, and subsequently asked NGO leaders to identify the attributes of NGOs with a reputation of being particularly effective organizations. The most frequently mentioned attributes mentioned were: the instantiation of sound principles or strategy (e.g., programs that exemplify good underlying vision, principles, and strategy); a grassroots approach (such as engagement with beneficiaries at the local level, using local capabilities, and a bottom‐up approach); a large organizational size and many resources (i.e., extensive infrastructure and high capacity); being collaborative (e.g., being a good partner, showing discretion in choosing partners, having a history of working together); singleness of focus (such as selectivity in choosing areas, finding a niche, and being persistent and sticking to the core areas of expertise with no mission creep); good campaigning abilities (the ability to raise funds and strategic use of campaign funding to ensure a solid financial footing); global scope (having a transnational infrastructure and a global perspective and reach); quality staff members; valuing similarities with peer organizations (in philosophy, vision and approach); a diversity of strategies (multiple types of programs, multipronged approach); dedication and professionalism (e.g., displaying passion, intensity, commitment, and being collegial, proactive, dependable, trustworthy, reliable, and transparent); and a distributed organizational structure (such as coalitions and federations). …”

Leading a Large‐Scale Distributed Social Enterprise

“…Relative to human capital and the pursuit of a culture of leadership, DSEs like Goodwill need to compete for the “best of the best” across sectors (Mitchell ). Attracting and retaining management talent with the capacity to compete in business while simultaneously responding to a community's most challenging and newly emerging social problems will remain a core challenge for DSEs.…”