2014
DOI: 10.5334/ojb.aa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Australian Breast Cancer Tissue Bank (ABCTB)

Abstract: The ABCTB was established in 2006 as an open access, not for profit resource dedicated to providing bio-specimens and/or data to both national and international research projects in the field of breast cancer. Donors are consented according to standard ethical principles for use of their material for unspecified future research. ABCTB collects fully annotated clinical samples and associated clinical and longitudinal data from donors. Material and data is supplied to research projects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, they trained and evaluated their classifier to predict PR and HER2 status and obtained an AUC of 0.810 (95% CI: 0.769-0.846) on PR and an AUC of 0.778 (95% CI: 0.730-0.825) on HER2. Rawat et al (34), trained a CNN classifier on 939 TCGA H&E images to predict HER2 status and were able to achieve slide-level AUCs of 0.71 through internal cross-validation, though unexpectedly they observed a higher AUC (0.79) on an independent set (35). Bychkov et al (36), investigated whether predicting HER2 status using a CNN model can guide the choice of therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, they trained and evaluated their classifier to predict PR and HER2 status and obtained an AUC of 0.810 (95% CI: 0.769-0.846) on PR and an AUC of 0.778 (95% CI: 0.730-0.825) on HER2. Rawat et al (34), trained a CNN classifier on 939 TCGA H&E images to predict HER2 status and were able to achieve slide-level AUCs of 0.71 through internal cross-validation, though unexpectedly they observed a higher AUC (0.79) on an independent set (35). Bychkov et al (36), investigated whether predicting HER2 status using a CNN model can guide the choice of therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bychkov et al (36), investigated whether predicting HER2 status using a CNN model can guide the choice of therapy. The study utilized cancer tissue samples from FinProg patient series (35), the FinProg validation series (37), and the FinHer clinical trial (38), all of which had HER2 amplification determined by CISH. Their CNN model, trained on 693 H&E-stained patient samples from the FinProg series, was able to predict tile-level HER2 status with AUC 0.70 in a 5-fold cross validation and AUC 0.67 on 712 test images from the FinHer dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their model achieved a slide-level HER2 AUC of 0.71 (TCGA, n = 124) in a 5-fold cross validation. They also tested the generalizability of their model using an independent cohort from The Australian Breast Cancer Tissue Bank (ABCTB) (35). Their model achieved a slide-level Her2 AUC = 0.79 (ABCTB, n = 2487).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, they trained and evaluated their classifier to predict PR and HER2 status and obtained an AUC of 0.810 (95% CI: 0.769-0.846) on PR and an AUC of 0.778 (95% CI: 0.730-0.825) on HER2. Rawat et al (34), trained a CNN classifier on 939 TCGA H&E images to predict HER2 status and were able to achieve slide-level AUCs of 0.71 through internal cross-validation, though unexpectedly they observed a higher AUC (0.79) on an independent set (35). Bychkov et al (36), investigated whether predicting HER2 status using a CNN model can guide the choice of therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation