2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2006.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The auto-regulative capability of pitcher irrigation system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By plotting ln( h / h o ) as a function of time, K S (mm day ¯ 1 ) was determined from the slope of the graph. The surface area of a given pitcher was calculated (Abu‐Zreig et al ., ) by plotting its actual surface curvature as a function of height ( X ), as shown in Figures and . The radius of a pitcher ( Y ) was measured for each incremental height.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By plotting ln( h / h o ) as a function of time, K S (mm day ¯ 1 ) was determined from the slope of the graph. The surface area of a given pitcher was calculated (Abu‐Zreig et al ., ) by plotting its actual surface curvature as a function of height ( X ), as shown in Figures and . The radius of a pitcher ( Y ) was measured for each incremental height.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WF was correlated with LD in air, which was related to RH as per Equation (1). For measuring the hydraulic conductivity of the pitcher wall ( Figure 3) the rate of fall in the head was measured with time (Abu-Zreig et al, 2006). The pitchers were initially saturated for 72 h before measurements.…”
Section: Ld Barsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…He also notes that empty pots can be used to drain saturated soils. Abu-Zreig et al (2006) describe laboratory tests of the auto-regulatory performance of two groups of pitchers, those with high and low hydraulic conductivity, and confirms their differing seepage rates under various evaporation conditions. Tesfaye et al (2011) found that clay pot irrigation with nitrogen fertilization of tomato plants in Ethiopia is far more productive and water-efficient than furrow irrigation.…”
Section: Clay Pot or Pitcher Irrigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pitcher irrigation is a low cost and simple method with high potential of water saving (Abu-Zreig et al 2006). Combination of pitcher irrigation with treated wastewater resource could be an efficient system to reduce total dissolved elements and treat municipal and industrial wastewater (Najafi et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%