“…But before I reconsider the relationship between Buddhism and deconstruction, it is I appropriate that I contextualise my own invested interest in intellectual hospitality by outlining some salient points about my reciprocal pursuits of Buddhism and poststructuralist-inflected cultural theory. I have elaborated on the specific challenges circumscribing this coterminous sacred-scholarly profession and the question it raises about the role of faith in academia elsewhere, exploring them in the context of cultural studies' general neglect of religion and with regard to the place of autoethnography in the postcolonial study of Buddhism (Ng 2012a(Ng , 2012b(Ng , 2011 (Gombrich 1993;Lopez 1995Lopez , 2002Lopez , 2008McMahan 2008;Sharf 1993Sharf , 1995Snodgrass 2003Snodgrass , 2007. For whether it be the Orientalist reification of a textualised Buddhism as a means to denigrate the perceived degeneracy of native Buddhist customs (Almond 1988: 95;Lopez 2008: 9), or the appropriation of Western scientific rationalism by the 'Protestant Buddhist' movement in Ceylon as a means to resist colonial rule and Christian missionisation (Gombrich 1993;Lopez 2008: 153-195; see also Prothero 1996), or the underlying Japanese chauvinism and nationalism of D.T.…”