The Automatic Integration of Folksonomies with Taxonomies Using Non-axiomatic Logic

Geldart, Joe; Cummins, Stephen

doi:10.1007/b137171_38

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A choice of low-quality tags in the user-generated folksonomy have negative effect on the quality of the tag-based retrieved search results and user’s experience (Li et al ., 2012). Further pointed out by Geldart and Cummins (2010), low-quality tag creates problems, especially when looking at the subjects that have commercial significance. Once we have a collection of worthy tags we can utilize them in various ways, for example, displaying the good tags on tag cloud to enhance search and navigation.…”

Section: Significance Of Selected Aspectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality-protected folksonomy maintenance approaches: a brief survey

Jabeen

Khusro

2015

The Knowledge Engineering Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Folksonomy gives liberty to its users to freely assign chosen keywords as tags, and this is the main reason behind its popularity. Apart from freedom, this system also reflects the collective intelligence of the crowd. However, this freedom and liberty can degrade quality of the folksonomy. It is required that quality of the folksonomy must remain consistently excellent and does not degrade with the passage of time. This is a survey paper, in which we present a brief survey of the research efforts intended to maintain a quality-protected folksonomy. We have organized our paper by looking at the problem from four aspects namely selection of quality tags, tag management features provided by folksonomy applications, folksonomy cleaning and interoperability of tags across platforms. We conclude our review with some of the interesting research topics, which need to be explored further. Our conclusion will be relevant and beneficial for engineers and designers who aim to design and maintain a quality-protected folksonomy.

show abstract

Section: Significance Of Selected Aspectsmentioning

confidence: 99%