2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00013-006-1899-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The automorphism group of a split metacyclic p-group

Abstract: This paper finds the order, structure and presentation for the automorphism group of a split metacyclic p-group, where p is odd.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
39
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This, together with [6,7], gives the complete answer to the Question 15 from [5] (respectively Question 20 from [4]) in the case of metacyclic groups. In Section 2 we generalize the results from [13] and we specify a method of finding relations in an automorphism group, that we will use in the next Sections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This, together with [6,7], gives the complete answer to the Question 15 from [5] (respectively Question 20 from [4]) in the case of metacyclic groups. In Section 2 we generalize the results from [13] and we specify a method of finding relations in an automorphism group, that we will use in the next Sections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In this paper we find the complete structure for the automorphism groups of metacyclic minimal nonabelian 2-groups. This, together with [6,7], gives the complete answer to the Question 15 from [5] (respectively Question 20 from [4]) in the case of metacyclic groups. We also correct some inaccuracies and extend the results from [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…That is, G = H K is a semidirect product of H by K. For any θ ∈ Aut G, let θ(h) = α(h)γ(h) and θ(k) = β(k)δ(k) for all h ∈ H, k ∈ K, where α : H → H, β : K → H, γ : H → K and δ : K → K are maps uniquely determined by θ. For convenience we shall write θ = α β γ δ , a 2 × 2 matrix of maps which satisfy all the conditions in Lemma 2.1 in [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We shall use the notation in [1]. There h k = khk −1 for h ∈ H, k ∈ K, and Aut C K (H) (K) = {δ ∈ Aut K|k −1 δ(k) ∈ C K (H), ∀ k ∈ K}.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation