The autonomic phenotype of rumination

Ottaviani, Cristina; Shapiro, David; Davydov, Dmitry M.; Goldstein, Iris B.; Mills, Paul J.

doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.12.014

Cited by 72 publications

(75 citation statements)

References 89 publications

(105 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Contrary to results from our previous study (Ottaviani, Shapiro, Davydov, Goldstein, & Mills, 2009), which indicated a stronger vagal withdrawal in women compared to men, but in agreement with other authors' findings (Glynn et al, 2002;Suarez et al, 2004), gender differences in autonomic activation were not shown during the anger recall task. It has to be noted that our previous study only required participants to think about the anger episode, whereas in the present and other studies that got comparable results, participants had to talk about this episode (Glynn et al, 2002;Suarez et al, 2004).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Rumination in the laboratory: What happens when you go back to everyday life?

2010

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rumination has been suggested to mediate the physiological consequences of stress on health. We studied the effects of rumination evoked in the laboratory and subsequent changes over 24 h. Heart rate (HR) and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP) were monitored in 27 male and 33 female participants during baseline, reading, an anger recall interview, and recovery. Half of the sample was assigned to a distraction condition. The lab session was followed by a 24‐hour ambulatory (A)HR and BP recording and self‐reports of moods and rumination. Rumination was associated with higher SBP, DBP, and HR and increased negative mood compared to distraction. Rumination during the day was a strong predictor of AHR, ABP, and mood. BP reactivity in the laboratory and increases in ABP during rumination were related. The effects of negative cognition on health go far beyond the recovery periods usually measured in the laboratory, thus playing a pathogenic role.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Rumination in the laboratory: What happens when you go back to everyday life?

2010

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is thought to be caused by disinhibition of the normal inhibitory control of sympathetic neural circuits mediated by the prefrontal cortex leading to sympathetic dominance and parasympathetic withdrawal (Brosschot et al, 2007). The extent of vagal withdrawal during ruminative thoughts has been found to be further modulated by certain personality traits (Ottaviani et al, 2009;Shinba et al, 2008). Higher depressiveness and especially anxiety in daily life were correlated to decreased HRV responsiveness indicating pathological autonomic rigidity.…”

Section: Hrv In Relation To Chronic Work Stress and Burnoutmentioning

confidence: 99%

A biological perspective on differences and similarities between burnout and depression

Orosz

Federspiel²,

Haisch

et al. 2017

Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Such approaches include the evaluation of balance of tolerance/sensitivity to regular stress through comparing work/non-work days or waking/sleeping states (Davydov, Shapiro, & Goldstein, 2004;Davydov, Shapiro, et al, 2005;), or behavioural, subjective and physiological components of emotional reactivity to simple stimuli (e.g., pain), or complex information such as aversive tasks, films or texts in laboratory studies (Ottaviani, Shapiro, Davydov, Goldstein, Mills, 2009;Davydov et al, 2008;Lysenko & Davydov, 2008). These tests of reactivity to minor stressors have been proposed to assess a level of adaptive or maladaptive coordination of behavioural and physiological responses in particular contexts as a trait representing a mood-protecting endophenotype and maintaining a balance of negative and positive experiences (Wichers et al, 2007a;.…”

Section: Measures Of Mental Resiliencementioning

confidence: 99%

Resilience and Mental Health

Southwick¹,

Litz²,

Charney³

et al. 2011

167

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Humans are remarkably resilient in the face of crises, traumas, disabilities, attachment losses and ongoing adversities. To date, most research in the field of traumatic stress has focused on neurobiological, psychological and social factors associated with trauma-related psychopathology and deficits in psychosocial functioning. Far less is known about resilience to stress and healthy adaptation to stress and trauma. This book brings together experts from a broad array of scientific fields whose research has focused on adaptive responses to stress. Each of the five sections in the book examines the relevant concepts, spanning from factors that contribute to and promote resilience, to populations and societal systems in which resilience is employed, to specific applications and contexts of resilience and interventions designed to better enhance resilience. This will be suitable for clinicians and researchers who are interested in resilience across the lifespan and in response to a wide variety of stressors.

show abstract

The autonomic phenotype of rumination

Cited by 72 publications

References 89 publications

Rumination in the laboratory: What happens when you go back to everyday life?

Rumination in the laboratory: What happens when you go back to everyday life?

A biological perspective on differences and similarities between burnout and depression

Resilience and Mental Health

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About