2000
DOI: 10.1007/s004250050696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The auxin-resistant diageotropica mutant of tomato responds to gravity via an auxin-mediated pathway

Abstract: Hypocotyls of the diageotropica (dgt) mutant of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) do not elongate in response to exogenous auxin, but can respond to gravity. This appears paradoxical in light of the Cholodny-Went hypothesis, which states that shoot gravicurvature results from asymmetric stimulation of elongation by auxin. While light-grown dgt seedlings can achieve correct gravitropic reorientation, the response is slow compared to wild-type seedlings. The sensitivity of dgt seedlings to inhibition of gra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…demonstrates a pleiotropic phenotype that includes a slow gravitropic response, lack of lateral roots, reduced apical dominance, altered vascular development, and reduced fruit growth (Balbi and Lomax 2003;Coenen and Lomax 1998;Rice and Lomax 2000;Zobel 1973Zobel , 1974. While displaying reduced auxin sensitivity with respect to elongation growth and ethylene production (Kelly and Bradford 1986), the dgt mutant does not exhibit altered levels (Fujino et al 1988) or transport of auxin (Rice and Lomax 2000). Interestingly, the dgt mutation appears to affect the expression of only a subset of auxin-regulated genes in a tissue-and developmental stage-specific manner (Balbi and Lomax 2003;Mito and Bennett 1995;Nebenfuhr et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…demonstrates a pleiotropic phenotype that includes a slow gravitropic response, lack of lateral roots, reduced apical dominance, altered vascular development, and reduced fruit growth (Balbi and Lomax 2003;Coenen and Lomax 1998;Rice and Lomax 2000;Zobel 1973Zobel , 1974. While displaying reduced auxin sensitivity with respect to elongation growth and ethylene production (Kelly and Bradford 1986), the dgt mutant does not exhibit altered levels (Fujino et al 1988) or transport of auxin (Rice and Lomax 2000). Interestingly, the dgt mutation appears to affect the expression of only a subset of auxin-regulated genes in a tissue-and developmental stage-specific manner (Balbi and Lomax 2003;Mito and Bennett 1995;Nebenfuhr et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tomato dgt mutants exhibit a pleiotropic phenotype that includes a slow gravitropic response, lack of lateral roots, reduced apical dominance, shortened internodes, altered vascular development and reduced fertility and fruit growth (Zobel, 1973;Mito and Bennett, 1995;Rice and Lomax, 2000;Balbi and Lomax, 2003;Ivanchenko et al, 2006). Application of auxin to tomato dgt mutants does not stimulate shoot elongation and the effect on root growth inhibition is reduced compared with the wild type (WT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dgt lesion is a single-gene mutation resulting in reduced sensitivity of dgt roots to auxin (Muday et al 1995, Rice andLomax 2000). The parental wild type of this mutant, VFN8, developed normal epidermal root cells when grown under control conditions (Table 2 and Fig.…”
Section: Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 94%