1994
DOI: 10.1177/002182869402500203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Babylonian Unit of Time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stephenson and some researchers have identified hundreds of eclipse and occultation observations in early European, Middle Eastern and Chinese annals, manuscripts, canons and records. Also, some of them have fit a lot of records with simple polynomials to achieve best fits for describing the value of Δ T for centuries before ad 1600 (Morrison & Ward 1975; Stephenson & Morrison 1984; Stephenson & Houlden 1986; Stephenson & Fatoohi 1994; Stephenson & Fatoohi 1995; Stephenson 1997; Stephenson & Morrison 1995; Steele 1998; Morrison & Stephenson 2004). In spite of their relatively low precision, these data represent our only record of the value of Δ T during the past several millennia.…”
Section: Values Of δT and Analytical Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stephenson and some researchers have identified hundreds of eclipse and occultation observations in early European, Middle Eastern and Chinese annals, manuscripts, canons and records. Also, some of them have fit a lot of records with simple polynomials to achieve best fits for describing the value of Δ T for centuries before ad 1600 (Morrison & Ward 1975; Stephenson & Morrison 1984; Stephenson & Houlden 1986; Stephenson & Fatoohi 1994; Stephenson & Fatoohi 1995; Stephenson 1997; Stephenson & Morrison 1995; Steele 1998; Morrison & Stephenson 2004). In spite of their relatively low precision, these data represent our only record of the value of Δ T during the past several millennia.…”
Section: Values Of δT and Analytical Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%