An exhaustive assessment of biodiversity is a major challenge of
ecological research, and molecular approaches such as the metabarcoding
of environmental DNA are boosting our ability to perform biodiversity
inventories. Are we actually able to assess the whole community, to
unravel the intricate interactions between organisms and the impacts of
global changes on the different trophic levels? The majority of
metabarcoding papers published in the last years used just one or two
markers and analyzed a limited number of taxonomic groups. Nevertheless,
approaches are emerging that might allow “all-taxa biological
inventories”. Exhaustive biodiversity assessments can be attempted by
combining a large number of specific primers, by exploiting the power of
universal primers, or by combining specific and universal primers to
obtain good information on key taxa while limiting the overlooked
biodiversity. Multiplexes of primers and shotgun sequencing may provide
a better coverage of biodiversity compared to standard metabarcoding,
but still require major methodological advances. We identify the
strengths and limitations of different approaches, and suggest new
development lines that might improve broad scale biodiversity analyses
in the near future.