2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The balance recovery bimodal model in stroke patients between evidence and speculation: Do recent studies support it?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Severity of stroke may be one of the factors. Inhibitory rTMS may be less effective for those with severe stroke [ 23 , 47 , 48 ]. The vicariation model holds that activity in the unaffected hemisphere is likely to play an important role in motor recovery, especially among those with larger stroke lesions on the ipsilesional side [ 23 , 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Severity of stroke may be one of the factors. Inhibitory rTMS may be less effective for those with severe stroke [ 23 , 47 , 48 ]. The vicariation model holds that activity in the unaffected hemisphere is likely to play an important role in motor recovery, especially among those with larger stroke lesions on the ipsilesional side [ 23 , 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activity in the unaffected hemisphere contributes to functional recovery after stroke, which is called vicariation mechanism ( Di Pino et al, 2014 ). From the results of DTI, not only competition mechanism, but also vicariation mechanism existed between the two hemispheres after rTMS intervention, which is called a bimodal balance-recovery model ( Di Pino et al, 2014 ; Di Pino and Di Lazzaro, 2020 ). This is inconsistent with the result of Li et al (2018) , who demonstrated that the FA increased in the contralesional corticocerebellar pathways might reflect the contralesional compensation by high-frequency rTMS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of short‐term immobilization to modulate IHI could be leveraged in individuals where a shift in IHI balance would be beneficial. For example, one model of stroke recovery posits that an imbalance in IHI may contribute to persistent motor dysfunction (Di Pino et al, 2014 ; Di Pino & Di Lazzaro, 2020 ; Murase et al, 2004 ). Thus, immobilization may hold promise as a noninvasive neuromodulation approach to rebalance activity between hemisphere to facilitate post‐stroke recovery in some patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%