“…The literature on ITAs widely recognizes that language, pedagogy, and culture are essential components of effective training programs for ITAs (Althen, 1991;Bailey, 1984;Finder, 2005;Gravois, 2005;Hoekje & Williams, 1992;King, 1998;Smith et al, 1992); however, the predominant focus in the literature on ITAs addresses issues of pronunciation and intelligibility (Dick & Robinson, 1993;Morley, 1991;Pickering, 2001;Thomas & Monoson, 1993;Tyler, 1992;Williams, 1992), pedagogical effectiveness (Luo, Grady, & Bellows, 2001;Ross & Krider, 1992;Twale, Shannon, & Moore, 1997), undergraduate student perspectives (Kavas & Kavas, 2008;Plakans, 1997;Rao, 1995;Rubin, 1992;Smyrniou, 1994;Twale, Shannon, & Moore, 1997;Yook & Albert, 1999), and various aspects of assessment and training for ITAs Fleisher, Hashimoto, & Weinberg, 2002;Halleck & Moder, 1995;Hoekje & Linnell, 1994;Hoekje & Williams, 1992;Jenkins & Parra, 2003;Rubin, 1993;Tanner, Selfe, & Wiegand, 1993). Few studies specifically address the role of culture in the assessment and training of ITAs (Hill & Lakey, 1995;Chen, 2005;Luo, Grady, & Bellows, 2001;Smith, 1993), and even fewer studies focus on what we can learn directly from ITAs themselves…”