2008
DOI: 10.1080/01629770801908697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Baltic States As ‘Small States’: Negotiating The ‘East’ By Engaging The ‘West’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The OSCE's High Commissioner on National Minorities in particular put pressure on the Latvian government to liberalize citizenship and language laws (Muižnieks and Brands Kehris 2003, pp. 30-55;McMahon 2006;Lamoreaux and Galbreath 2008). However, the transnational vision was not unilaterally imposed by these organizations.…”
Section: Nationalism and Transnationalism After 1989: Lessons For Demmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The OSCE's High Commissioner on National Minorities in particular put pressure on the Latvian government to liberalize citizenship and language laws (Muižnieks and Brands Kehris 2003, pp. 30-55;McMahon 2006;Lamoreaux and Galbreath 2008). However, the transnational vision was not unilaterally imposed by these organizations.…”
Section: Nationalism and Transnationalism After 1989: Lessons For Demmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…6 Staunch Atlanticism also provided further ammunition to critics in Western capitals who alleged that Central and Eastern European states play the role of US 'Trojan horse' in Europe, undercutting not only the transatlantic alliance but also the efforts to forge a common EU approach to Russia-both of which are, paradoxically, deemed by Central and East European strategists as quintessential to the long-term security of their region. In conclusion, it can be said that the Atlanticist foreign policy across the Central and East European region violates the neorealist 'small states theory' insofar as the theory expects small states simply to bandwagon, not pursue activist and venturesome policies (Lamoreaux & Galbreath 2008). This suggests that, in addition to interest-based explanations, one should also consider other, non-material, justifications.…”
Section: Foreign Policy In Central and Eastern Europe 1195mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the case of 'Atlanticist' Central European states, structural 'determinants' dictating national interests can be analysed in the context of 'small states theory '. 4 This posits that small states under threat-in this case, perceived threat from post-Soviet Russia-will seek the support of a powerful ally (the USA) to 'bandwagon' on its security provision even at the expense of partial loss of sovereignty (Lamoreaux & Galbreath 2008).…”
Section: The Limitations Of the Realpolitik Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the Baltic States have become a more frequent subject of political discourse and mass media since the Ukraine crisis, still there is little scholarly literature on the subject. Since 2013 the Baltic States were examined by Jeremy W. Lamoreaux (Russia-Baltic relations) (Lamoreaux and Galbreath, 2008), Kristi Raik (EU-Russia relations and the Baltic factor) (Raik, 2016), Arunas Molis (Energy security of the Baltic States) (Molis, 2014), Ieva Karpaviciute (Lithuania-Polish relations) (Karpaviciute, 2014), Luke Coffey (the U.S.-Baltic relations in security domain) (Coffey, 2013), Diana Jurgeleviciute (the U.S.-Lithuanian relations in security domain) (Jurgeleviciute, 2015). The most significant contribution to the Baltic States' foreign policy analysis is a collective publication 'Ambicingas dešimtmetis' (Jakniunaite, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%