2020
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2019.305457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Bard Prison Initiative: Education, Incarceration, and Public Health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literacy and numeracy rates are above 98% in all population groups inclusive of age and gender. The increased literacy and numeracy achievements have been directly correlated to improved health and wellbeing, reduced drug and alcohol addictions, increased employment, reduced crime – particularly in the area of gendered violence, and reduced corruption in government and non-government organisations (Dhrifi et al, 2020; Fullilove et al, 2020; Remeikienė et al, 2020). Educational spending is scrutinised within the recently introduced DecAS supplementary biennial report, to ensure that the economic benefits from reduced incarcerations and, welfare and health demands are reinvested in education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literacy and numeracy rates are above 98% in all population groups inclusive of age and gender. The increased literacy and numeracy achievements have been directly correlated to improved health and wellbeing, reduced drug and alcohol addictions, increased employment, reduced crime – particularly in the area of gendered violence, and reduced corruption in government and non-government organisations (Dhrifi et al, 2020; Fullilove et al, 2020; Remeikienė et al, 2020). Educational spending is scrutinised within the recently introduced DecAS supplementary biennial report, to ensure that the economic benefits from reduced incarcerations and, welfare and health demands are reinvested in education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current pedagogical examples of interrogating structural racism, including the PIC, are limited (Chandler et al, 2022; Rice, 2022). However, there are some examples of public health faculty who teach courses related to the public health impacts of criminalization and mass incarceration (Duarte et al, 2020; Fullilove et al, 2020; Heller & Galea, 2020; Nowotny et al, 2020; Rice, 2022) as well as efforts in social work (James, 2021) and medicine (Asmerom et al, 2022) that integrate abolition into the curriculum. Echoing other recent calls, there is a need for academic public health to generate scholarship and train professionals on the population health consequences of the PIC and develop community-led strategies to reduce incarceration (Heller & Galea, 2020).…”
Section: Public Health and Abolitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means abolitionist public health can be pursued in a myriad of ways from the interpersonal to the systemic level. For example, we can integrate the public health consequences of the PIC into the curriculum (Heller & Galea, 2020); organize alongside existing student-led efforts such as the national abolitionist Cops off Campus Coalition (2022); contribute to public health education for those who are incarcerated (Fullilove et al, 2020); join local mutual aid efforts (Spade, 2020); examine the health inequities in the carceral system that have been illuminated by the COVID-19 pandemic to advocate for decarceration at local prison and jails (Beckett et al, 2021); and organize and build power with students (Little, 2020) and faculty (University of Michigan School of Public Health Faculty, 2020) to demand university’s investment in policing be redirected to mental health services, affordable housing, adequate pay, and other factors that create more equitable and just campuses. While we do not expect academic spaces to be a sole source of abolition, we see it as a site of struggle, collaboration, and learning on the way toward abolition.…”
Section: Call To Action and Invitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While studies have shown that delivering higher education to individuals involved with the criminal justice system reduces recidivism rates (Castro, 2018;Fullilove, Cortes, Gamarra, & Maxis, 2020;O'Brien, King, Phillips, & Kath, 2021), it has taken several decades for researchers and stakeholders to demonstrate the magnitude of this impact to governing agencies (Batiuk et al, 1997;Curtis, 2021;Evans, 2018;Nally, 2012). Even though the research is enviably clear, that higher education directly impacts recidivism, there are still several barriers that need to be addressed (Gashi, 2021;Gould, 2018;Ludlow, Armstrong, & Bartels, 2019;Te Pere & Stewart, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%