2015
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2015.00100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The basic genetic toolkit to move in with your photosynthetic partner

Abstract: The origin of photosynthetic organelles via endosymbiosis more than 1 Gya ago was a major detonator of eukaryotic diversification. The evolution of a stable endosymbiotic relationship between eukaryotic cells and photosynthetic cyanobacteria involved series of cellular and molecular processes that are not entirely understood. Critical steps toward the evolution of plastids occurred when the host cell gained genetic and metabolic control over the captured cyanobacterium. Proteins recruited from the host reperto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 73 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it has been proposed that it protects endosymbiont genes from mutational hazard (Allen and Raven 1996; Lynch, et al 2006; Smith 2016; Speijer, et al 2020), and that it enables endosymbiont genes that are otherwise trapped in a haploid genome to recombine and thus escape from Muller’s ratchet (Muller 1964; Lynch 1996; Martin and Herrmann 1998; Lynch, et al 2006; Neiman and Taylor 2009; Smith 2016). It has also been proposed that endosymbiotic gene transfer is an inevitable consequence of a constant stream of endosymbiont genes entering the nucleus (Doolittle 1998), and that transfer to the nuclear genome allows the host cell to gain better control over the replication and function of the organelle (Herrmann 1997) allowing better cellular network integration (Nowack, et al 2010; Reyes-Prieto 2015). However, mutation rates of organellar genes are often not higher than nuclear genes (Wolfe, et al 1987; Lynch, et al 2006; Lynch, et al 2007; Drouin, et al 2008; Smith 2015; Smith and Keeling 2015; Smith 2016; Grisdale, et al 2019) and therefore effective mechanisms for protection against DNA damage in organelles must exist.…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it has been proposed that it protects endosymbiont genes from mutational hazard (Allen and Raven 1996; Lynch, et al 2006; Smith 2016; Speijer, et al 2020), and that it enables endosymbiont genes that are otherwise trapped in a haploid genome to recombine and thus escape from Muller’s ratchet (Muller 1964; Lynch 1996; Martin and Herrmann 1998; Lynch, et al 2006; Neiman and Taylor 2009; Smith 2016). It has also been proposed that endosymbiotic gene transfer is an inevitable consequence of a constant stream of endosymbiont genes entering the nucleus (Doolittle 1998), and that transfer to the nuclear genome allows the host cell to gain better control over the replication and function of the organelle (Herrmann 1997) allowing better cellular network integration (Nowack, et al 2010; Reyes-Prieto 2015). However, mutation rates of organellar genes are often not higher than nuclear genes (Wolfe, et al 1987; Lynch, et al 2006; Lynch, et al 2007; Drouin, et al 2008; Smith 2015; Smith and Keeling 2015; Smith 2016; Grisdale, et al 2019) and therefore effective mechanisms for protection against DNA damage in organelles must exist.…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%