2018
DOI: 10.1002/jeab.304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The basis of behavioral momentum in the nonlinearity of strength

Abstract: The persistence of operant responding in the context of distractors and opposing forces is of central importance to the success of behavioral interventions. It has been successfully analyzed with Behavioral Momentum Theory. Key data from the research inspired by that theory are reanalyzed in terms of more molecular behavioral mechanisms: the demotivational effects of disruptors, and their differential impacts on the target response and other responses that interact with them. Behavioral momentum is regrounded … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
(144 reference statements)
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It may also be the case that operant extinction is governed predominantly by discriminative stimulus-reinforcer relations under some circumstances (i.e., multiple schedules) and reinforcerdiscrimination based processes under others (i.e., single schedules). To our knowledge, no contemporary theory of extinction explores fully the potential for joint control of behavior by these two processes, though such a theory might hold the promise of conceptually reconciling the differences in resistance to extinction between single and multiple schedules (see Killeen & Nevin, 2018, for an alternative approach to understanding extinction performance that also may address this issue). Future empirical and theoretical work is necessary to determine more precisely whether and how these behavior processes interact to give rise to the behavior that is observed during extinction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may also be the case that operant extinction is governed predominantly by discriminative stimulus-reinforcer relations under some circumstances (i.e., multiple schedules) and reinforcerdiscrimination based processes under others (i.e., single schedules). To our knowledge, no contemporary theory of extinction explores fully the potential for joint control of behavior by these two processes, though such a theory might hold the promise of conceptually reconciling the differences in resistance to extinction between single and multiple schedules (see Killeen & Nevin, 2018, for an alternative approach to understanding extinction performance that also may address this issue). Future empirical and theoretical work is necessary to determine more precisely whether and how these behavior processes interact to give rise to the behavior that is observed during extinction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this point, it appears to us that the current version of the Behavioral Momentum Theory of resurgence need not be seriously considered further. Nevertheless, we note that a more recent formulation of the general framework of behavioral momentum (Killeen & Nevin, 2018) based on Killeen's (1994) Mathematical Principles of Reinforcement is couched in terms of response competition, and as those authors note, shares some conceptual similarities to the choice-based approach of RaC. As of yet, this new approach has not been extended to resurgence or other relapse phenomena.…”
Section: Ghosts Of Models Past and Futurementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, our models may obtain confirmation or be ruled out by extant or future data not only about Pavlovian conditioning, but also from the operant conditioning literature. In the second case, one invokes the possibility that associative models can also describe operant behavior (Killeen and Nevin, 2018). In the first case, the generality of the construction of learning models as dynamical models and the psychological interpretation put forward in section 4.2 make us believe that they can both be extended to other Pavlovian conditioning paradigms, such as eyeblink conditioning, where the average learning pattern may differ from the RW curve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%