2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-01482-6_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Basis of Nanomagnetism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
13

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
49
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The second assumption is met because the thickness of the Py wire is comparable to the Py exchange length 42 and the frequencies of the spin wave eigenmodes discussed in our work are well below the lowest branch of perpendicular standing spin waves (PSSW) 34,43 . The third assumption is met because the wavelength of the excited spin waves along the wire width is long (comparable to the CPS short length ∼10 µm).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second assumption is met because the thickness of the Py wire is comparable to the Py exchange length 42 and the frequencies of the spin wave eigenmodes discussed in our work are well below the lowest branch of perpendicular standing spin waves (PSSW) 34,43 . The third assumption is met because the wavelength of the excited spin waves along the wire width is long (comparable to the CPS short length ∼10 µm).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] In general, the magnetic properties of nanoparticles are strongly influenced by changing their size. The static and dynamic magnetic response of a small single-domain magnetic nanoparticle can be considered equivalent to the response of a single large spin, called a macrospin or superspin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulations used a 5 nm mesh, (i.e. comparable to the magnetostatic exchange length [8]) and employed the following magnetic parameters for a (110)-oriented STO substrate [9]: saturation magnetization, Ms = 5.6 x 10 5 A/m; exchange stiffness A = 1.86 x10 -12 J/m; and uniaxial strain anisotropy constant, K U = 1.9 x 10 4 J/m 3 . The Gilbert damping constant was set to α = 0.5 to allow rapid convergence in calculations.…”
Section: Micromagnetic Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%