2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The BDNF Val66Met Prodomain Disassembles Dendritic Spines Altering Fear Extinction Circuitry and Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It remains unclear what ligands drive p75 NTR signalling in cBF neurons, and whether p75 NTR acts to facilitate Trk receptor signalling as well as acting independently to facilitate synaptic pruning, driven by the developmental stage or expression levels of co-receptors. The current dogma would suggest that proneurotrophins, acting together with the sortilin/SorCS family of co-receptors, is likely to be responsible for the pruning of synapses and axons via p75 NTR (as has been recently reported for a developmentally transient, p75 NTR -positive, prefrontal cortex-projecting hippocampal neuronal population [140]). Although mice in which sortilin receptor members are conditionally knocked out in cBF neurons have not been analysed, sequestration of proNGF with specific antibodies causes mild impairment in cognitively taxing, distractor attention tasks without affecting baseline attention [141], suggestive of changes to cholinergic neurotransmission.…”
Section: Effects Of Loss Of P75 Ntr Expression On Behaviour and Synapmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It remains unclear what ligands drive p75 NTR signalling in cBF neurons, and whether p75 NTR acts to facilitate Trk receptor signalling as well as acting independently to facilitate synaptic pruning, driven by the developmental stage or expression levels of co-receptors. The current dogma would suggest that proneurotrophins, acting together with the sortilin/SorCS family of co-receptors, is likely to be responsible for the pruning of synapses and axons via p75 NTR (as has been recently reported for a developmentally transient, p75 NTR -positive, prefrontal cortex-projecting hippocampal neuronal population [140]). Although mice in which sortilin receptor members are conditionally knocked out in cBF neurons have not been analysed, sequestration of proNGF with specific antibodies causes mild impairment in cognitively taxing, distractor attention tasks without affecting baseline attention [141], suggestive of changes to cholinergic neurotransmission.…”
Section: Effects Of Loss Of P75 Ntr Expression On Behaviour and Synapmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…One likely explanation is that, in these latter mice, the removal of p75NTR protein occurs too late to affect the maturation of these parameters in the visual cortex, which have for the most part reached plateau by the first postnatal month (Chattopadhyaya et al, 2004;Kang et al, 2013;Picard et al, 2014). Because p75NTR expression differs among brain regions at the different ages (Holm et al, 2009;Giza et al, 2018), it would be interesting to investigate whether PV_Cre;p75NTR lox/lox conditional KO mice show altered cognitive functions implicating regions which mature later, such as the PFC (Giza et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temporal and cellular localization of p75NTR in cortical neurons has been an object of debate and discrepancy (Holm et al, 2009;Giza et al, 2018), likely due to low protein expression levels, especially in the adult brain, and suboptimal antibody sensitivity. To overcome these technical challenges, we used two novel experimental strategies.…”
Section: Cortical Pv Cells Express P75ntr During Development and In Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, the Val66met polymorphism of BDNF positioned in the prodomain alters the reported structural conformation (Anastasia et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2018), subcellular sorting and transport (Arango-Lievano et al, 2015a;Zanin et al, 2017), as well as activities of the prodomain: (i) Met66 carriers impaired the expression of LTD (Mizui et al, 2015), (ii) Met66 carriers elicited growth cone collapse (Anastasia et al, 2013) and (iii) Met66 carriers promoted dendritic spine elimination (Giza et al, 2018) as opposed to its counterpart the val66 carriers that facilitated LTD with no effects on axonal growth cones or dendritic spine turnover.…”
Section: Ii3 the Prodomainmentioning
confidence: 99%