2024
DOI: 10.3390/math12040562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Beddington–DeAngelis Competitive Response: Intra-Species Interference Enhances Coexistence in Species Competition

María Carmen Vera,
Marcos Marvá,
Víctor José García-Garrido
et al.

Abstract: Species coexistence is a major issue in ecology. We disentangled the role of individual interference when competing in the classical interference competition model. For the first time, we considered simultaneously intra- and inter-species interference by introducing the Beddington–DeAngelis competitive response into the classical competition model. We found a trade-off between intra- and inter-species interference that refines in a sense the well-known balance of intra- and inter-species competition coefficien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The balance between intraspecific and interspecific competition plays a major role in the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning [57]. However, individual interference when competing also helps to enhance coexistence in species competition [58]. In this study, we demonstrate that pathogen infection can increase the total biomass of the competitive system (as shown by the elevated yellow dashed line in Figures 2 and 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The balance between intraspecific and interspecific competition plays a major role in the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning [57]. However, individual interference when competing also helps to enhance coexistence in species competition [58]. In this study, we demonstrate that pathogen infection can increase the total biomass of the competitive system (as shown by the elevated yellow dashed line in Figures 2 and 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%