2013
DOI: 10.17161/jom.v0i23.4641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The bee genus <i>Ischnomelissa</i> in Peru, with a key to the species (Hymenoptera: Halictidae)

Abstract: Abstract.A new species of the rare augochlorine bee genus Ischnomelissa Engel (Augochlorini: Augochlorina) is described and figured from cloud forests of the Abra Patricia Reserve, Amazonas, Peru. Ischnomelissa lignopteryx Engel, new species, is distinguished from its congeners by the darkly infumate wing membranes, dark green and non-shining integument of the head and mesosoma, dark brown legs and metasoma (except basal patch of amber on the first metasomal tergum), and integumental sculpturing. A revised key… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…33 head, and variable form and sculpturing of the propodeum all tend to pull subset species of Caenaugochlora toward other genera. Although a formal relationship between Caenaugochlora and Chlerogella Michener or Ischnomelissa Engel has never been recovered (Engel, 2000), there are some striking similarities between the latter and species of the subgenus Ctenaugochlora Eickwort, particularly in the more elongate form of the propodeum, the shape of the head (at least for those non-rostrate species of Chlerogella and Ischnomelissa), and the densely pectinate inner metatibial spur (in Ctenaugochlora and Ischnomelissa) (Brooks & Engel, 1998;Engel, 1997bEngel, , 2010aEngel, , 2013Engel & Brooks, 2002;Engel & Rasmussen, 2013). Future work should explore the possibility that these groups are more closely related than presently hypothesized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 head, and variable form and sculpturing of the propodeum all tend to pull subset species of Caenaugochlora toward other genera. Although a formal relationship between Caenaugochlora and Chlerogella Michener or Ischnomelissa Engel has never been recovered (Engel, 2000), there are some striking similarities between the latter and species of the subgenus Ctenaugochlora Eickwort, particularly in the more elongate form of the propodeum, the shape of the head (at least for those non-rostrate species of Chlerogella and Ischnomelissa), and the densely pectinate inner metatibial spur (in Ctenaugochlora and Ischnomelissa) (Brooks & Engel, 1998;Engel, 1997bEngel, , 2010aEngel, , 2013Engel & Brooks, 2002;Engel & Rasmussen, 2013). Future work should explore the possibility that these groups are more closely related than presently hypothesized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of halictine genera occur in elevations close to the 2500 m mark set as "high elevations". For example, species of Ischnomelissa Engel (Engel, 2013), Chlerogas Vachal (Engel, 2009a(Engel, , 2010aEngel & Gonzalez, 2009;Engel et al, 2006), Caenaugochlora Michener (Gonçalves & Engel, 2010), and Chlerogella (Engel, 2010b;Engel & Rasmussen, 2013) sometimes meet and exceed 2400 m and it is possible that some of those species, or new species closely related, may eventually be discovered at or above 2500 m. Therefore, a greater diversity is expected at higher elevations as more habitats and locations are sampled across the Andean region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the descriptions, morphological terminology follows that of Eickwort (1969), Engel (2000, 2001, 2009b), and Michener (2007, while the format is adapted from that used elsewhere in Caenaugochlora (e.g., Engel, 1995aEngel, , 2009aEngel, , 2014, as well as more broadly among augochlorine bees (e.g., Engel, 1995bEngel, , 1997bEngel, , 2003Engel, , 2010aEngel, , 2010bEngel, , 2013aEngel, , 2013bEngel & Brooks, 2002;Engel et al, 1997Engel et al, , 2014Brooks & Engel, 1998, 1999Oliveira et al, 2012). Measurements were taken with an ocular micrometer on an Olympus SZX-12 stereomicroscope.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%