2021
DOI: 10.1017/rdc.2021.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THE BEGINNING OF THE IRON AGE AT ARSLANTEPE: A14C PERSPECTIVE

Abstract: The Iron Age chronology at Arslantepe is the result of the interpretation of Luwian hieroglyphic inscriptions and archaeological data coming from the site and its surrounding region. A new round of investigations of the Iron Age levels has been conducted at the site over the last 10 years. Preliminary results allowed the combination of the archaeological sequence with the historical events that extended from the collapse of the Late Bronze Age empires to the formation and development of the new Iron Age kingdo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). The excavations conducted continuously since 1961 by the Italian Archaeological Expedition in Eastern Anatolia from Sapienza University of Rome (MAIAO) allowed the discovery of a long and detailed sequence, mostly anchored to high precision 14C dating stretching from the end of the 5th millennium BC to the Byzantine era (Frangipane 2019;Vignola et al 2019;Manuelli et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). The excavations conducted continuously since 1961 by the Italian Archaeological Expedition in Eastern Anatolia from Sapienza University of Rome (MAIAO) allowed the discovery of a long and detailed sequence, mostly anchored to high precision 14C dating stretching from the end of the 5th millennium BC to the Byzantine era (Frangipane 2019;Vignola et al 2019;Manuelli et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, a sequence of monumental structures, which spans from the 16th to the 10th centuries BC, were investigated for over 10 years (Pecorella 1975; Palmieri A 1973: 65-80; Manuelli 2013: 39-48). In 1971, the beginning of the activities on the southern sector marked the interruption of the large-scale investigations of the historical levels; nonetheless, a signi cant series of Late Bronze Age I domestic structures, dated to the 17th and 16th centuries BC, have been unearthed over the years (Palmieri A 1973 have been conducted over a large area, leading to the discovery of an uninterrupted sequence from the mid-13th to the 7th century BC (Manuelli et al 2021). In 2016, a new area was opened with the aim of connecting the northern sector with the inner part of the settlement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, some of the round and oval pits (such as K1574) that measure 4.5 m long and almost 2 m deep surpass the standard size for household activities. The pit dated to the 11th century BC (Manuelli et al 2021), fig. 7 shows traces of chaff plaster and is connected to an open-air surface that reaches the mound wall; but when compared with the evidence from Late Bronze Age/Iron Age levels at Alalakh, Chatal Höyük and Tille Höyük, the dimensional differences are not striking (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%