Biocomputing 2013 2012
DOI: 10.1142/9789814447973_0027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Behavior of Admixed Populations in Neighbor-Joining Inference of Population Trees

Abstract: Neighbor-joining is one of the most widely used methods for constructing evolutionary trees. This approach from phylogenetics is often employed in population genetics, where distance matrices obtained from allele frequencies are used to produce a representation of population relationships in the form of a tree. In phylogenetics, the utility of neighbor-joining derives partly from a result that for a class of distance matrices including those that are additive or tree-like-generated by summing weights over the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, African populations exhibited the greatest diversity (Pool et al 2012) and clustered at the base of the tree while European populations clustered at the tip. North American and Australian populations generally clustered between African and European populations (Figure 2), a pattern that supports the model (Kopelman et al 2013) that both North American and Australian populations result from secondary contact of European and African ones.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…As expected, African populations exhibited the greatest diversity (Pool et al 2012) and clustered at the base of the tree while European populations clustered at the tip. North American and Australian populations generally clustered between African and European populations (Figure 2), a pattern that supports the model (Kopelman et al 2013) that both North American and Australian populations result from secondary contact of European and African ones.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…As expected from the analyses of population genetic similarity and prior neighborjoining analysis of admixed populations (Kopelman et al 2013), the Q3 (African) and African Americans do not form large clusters, but rather appear as multiple individual branches close to the indigenous African populations, most similar to their African admixture source (Fig. 6E,F).…”
Section: Wwwgenomeorgsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Considering all comparisons between East Asian populations and Middle Eastern, European, and Central and South Asian populations, mean pairwise F ST is 0.091 (SD = 0.024, 504 pairs). The African American and Mexican American populations cluster at intermediate distances between the European cluster and most African and Central American populations, respectively, reflecting the expectation of intermediate placement for admixed groups [9], [36][39]. Note that due to differences in their dimensionality reduction approaches, the MDS and neighbor-joining analyses are not always in agreement: for example, the Seri and Pima from northwestern Mexico cluster together on the MDS plot, whereas they have a relatively high F ST value (0.094), as shown by the long branches separating these populations on the neighbor-joining tree.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%